Moderator: ZS Global Moderators




Cockroach wrote:My two favorite recent sci-fi based apocalypse speculative fiction are (actually 4 as each had a very good/excellent sequel):
Daniel Suarez's
Daemonand sequel
Freedom Plots of both books focus on what happens to society when IT's system get compromised globally by a MMO/game designer. Great stuff, solid real world basis foundation. I envy anyone who's picking up for the first time..
John Barnes'
Directive 51
Daybreak Zero Plots focus on what happens when a internet 'viral' collective coordinate a nanobot infection of the world infrastructure. Excellent stuff.
I used these novels premises to evaluate my disaster contigency planning.


Honeypot wrote:Cockroach, I've never heard of those - interesting.
Please share your person top "older" SF apoc novels, so folks can get a better idea whether your tastes coincide with our own tastes.
I'm always eager to read new SF apoc stuff, but there's also a lot of crud out there.
To add to the list...
- Yeah, "Lucifer's Hammer" is the #1 "procedural" novel of all time, IMO.
- Anything by Heinlein, apoc or otherwise, should be on every SF fan's list.
- Ditto (though note as intensely) for anything by John Wyndham.
- I recently read the first book in the "Hunger Games" trilogy (at the recommendation of #1 daughter), and very much enjoyed it. It's a one day/sitting type book.
- If you'd like to read an "interesting solution" to Margaret Atwood's thoroughly depressing "The Handmaid's Tale", check out Sheri Tepper's superb "Gate To Women's Country". It starts out almost as depressing, then there's "the twist".
Women and Geeky men will particularly enjoy it.


ElevenBravo wrote:
Reading this one now, had to order it from the UK, good read.
Andrew



Confucius wrote:I've been pimping Hugh Howey's "Wool" series for a while now, got to do it again.

Logans Run wrote:Is that an Apocalyptic novel for kids?
(I am in no way saying that is a bad thing)
My grade 9 English teacher read this aloud in class to us and I always remembered it.
I read this story for an english assignment but I liked this book so much I read it again and again.



Logans Run wrote:ElevenBravo wrote:
Reading this one now, had to order it from the UK, good read.
Andrew
Is that an Apocalyptic novel for kids?
(I am in no way saying that is a bad thing)





Hanuman110 wrote:In addition to several of the above listed novels, I've always liked Wolf and Iron by Gordon R. Dickson.
Shiloh wrote:-Dies the Fire, book #1 of "The Change" series by S. M. Stirling. I honestly couldn't put this one down. The concept of the novel seems kind of strange at first when you initially get into it, but it really gets going soon thereafter. There were a few things I didn't like too much (quite a bit of anti-Christian comments and commentary, glorifying certain activities that I would otherwise not condone, etc.) but nothing I could really drag on about for hours.
-The Protector's War, book #2 of "The Change" series. I haven't finished it quite yet, but so far so good.
doc66 wrote:Shiloh wrote:-Dies the Fire, book #1 of "The Change" series by S. M. Stirling. I honestly couldn't put this one down. The concept of the novel seems kind of strange at first when you initially get into it, but it really gets going soon thereafter. There were a few things I didn't like too much (quite a bit of anti-Christian comments and commentary, glorifying certain activities that I would otherwise not condone, etc.) but nothing I could really drag on about for hours.
-The Protector's War, book #2 of "The Change" series. I haven't finished it quite yet, but so far so good.
LOL. I stopped reading after the second book. So many problems with the science in the book; if you can't build and make a steam engine, how do you boil water for cooking? And on and on. The series is a SCA/D&D wet dream.
Glad you liked it. I couldn't stop rolling my eyes. I realize that we have to suspend some disbelief, we are after all on a zombie forum, but Stirling just couldn't keep me suspended.
Krustofski wrote:Dude, you're an open system which has energy pumped into it at least once a day. Entropy doesn't stand a chance. Plus, all living things are thermodynamically unstable anyway, we're held together by pure kinetics. You're not special. Um... what I'm trying to say is: Happy Birthday.

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests