LECTER wrote:
Yeah, it's definitely on!
Come on, Lecter! Let's get 'em!
Moderator: ZS Global Moderators
LECTER wrote:
Yeah, it's definitely on!
George Orwell wrote:Power is not a means; it is an end. One does not establish a dictatorship in order to safeguard a revolution; one makes the revolution in order to establish the dictatorship. The object of persecution is persecution. The object of torture is torture. The object of power is power.
Rev wrote:squinty wrote:I predict a difficult, protracted and costly occupation that the invading force will come to regret. Just sayin'.
Otherwise known as every occupation of the last forty years.
George Orwell wrote:Power is not a means; it is an end. One does not establish a dictatorship in order to safeguard a revolution; one makes the revolution in order to establish the dictatorship. The object of persecution is persecution. The object of torture is torture. The object of power is power.
bae wrote:Berkem wrote:And the bigger collection you have the earlier theyll come.
Say, for the sake of argument, that I have > 300,000 rounds of centerfire ammunition on hand, and several hundred firearms. And while most aren't on any "list", probably a handful are. How should I proceed?
SMoAF wrote:'Tis better to light a flamethrower than curse the darkness.
12_Gauge_Chimp wrote:ZS Primate Squad to the rescue !

raptor wrote:Let me inject a note of reality.
This thread is talking about a country/power that is strong enough to build up an invasion force on our borders without our knowledge. A force so big and strong that they can physically invade and potentially occupy the continental US lower 48. Such a build up would take quite a while and a lot of sophisticated efforts at intelligence gathering.

SMoAF wrote:'Tis better to light a flamethrower than curse the darkness.
12_Gauge_Chimp wrote:ZS Primate Squad to the rescue !

Berkem wrote:Usa wins,but wastes most of its nukes
And then, some third force invades USA.Some coutries that were neutral,some might have even been USA allies block together and start a war with invasion.
Nuclear-Weapon States:
The nuclear-weapon states (NWS) are the five states—China, France, Russia, United Kingdom, and the United States—officially recognized as possessing nuclear weapons by the NPT. Although the treaty legitimizes these states’ nuclear arsenals, it also establishes that they are not supposed to build and maintain such weapons in perpetuity. Article VI of the treaty holds that each state-party is to “pursue negotiations in good faith on effective measures relating to cessation of the nuclear arms race at an early date and to nuclear disarmament.” In 2000, the five NWS committed themselves to an “unequivocal undertaking…to accomplish the total elimination of their nuclear arsenals.” But for now, the five continue to retain the bulk of their nuclear forces. Because of the secretive nature with which most governments treat information about their nuclear arsenals, most of the figures below are best estimates of each nuclear-weapon state’s nuclear holdings, including both strategic warheads and lower-yield devices referred to as tactical weapons.
China: About 240 total warheads.
France: Fewer than 300 operational warheads.
Russia: Approximately 1,566 operational strategic warheads [1], approximately 2,000 operational tactical warheads, and approximately 7,000 stockpiled strategic and tactical warheads.
United Kingdom: Fewer than 160 deployed strategic warheads, total stockpile of up to 225.
United States: Approximately 5,113 active and inactive [2] nuclear warheads and approximately 3,500 warheads retired and awaiting dismantlement. The 5,113 active and inactive nuclear warhead stockpile includes 1,790 deployed strategic warheads [1], approximately 500 operational tactical weapons, and approximately 2,645 inactive warheads.
Non-NPT Nuclear Weapons Possessors:
Three states—India, Israel, and Pakistan—never joined the NPT and are known to possess nuclear weapons. Claiming its nuclear program was for peaceful purposes, India first tested a nuclear explosive device in 1974. That test spurred Pakistan to ramp up work on its secret nuclear weapons program. India and Pakistan both publicly demonstrated their nuclear weapon capabilities with a round of tit-for-tat nuclear tests in May 1998. Israel has not publicly conducted a nuclear test, does not admit to or deny having nuclear weapons, and states that it will not be the first to introduce nuclear weapons in the Middle East. Nevertheless, Israel is universally believed to possess nuclear arms. The following arsenal estimates are based on the amount of fissile material—highly enriched uranium and plutonium—that each of the states is estimated to have produced. Fissile material is the key element for making nuclear weapons. India and Israel are believed to use plutonium in their weapons, while Pakistan is thought to use highly enriched uranium.
India: Up to 100 nuclear warheads.
Israel: Between 75 to 200 nuclear warheads.
Pakistan: Between 70 to 90 nuclear warheads.
SMoAF wrote:'Tis better to light a flamethrower than curse the darkness.
12_Gauge_Chimp wrote:ZS Primate Squad to the rescue !

Mr. E. Monkey wrote:bae wrote:Berkem wrote:And the bigger collection you have the earlier theyll come.
Say, for the sake of argument, that I have > 300,000 rounds of centerfire ammunition on hand, and several hundred firearms. And while most aren't on any "list", probably a handful are. How should I proceed?
Give them to the monkey.![]()
(Eh, it was worth a shot.)
George Orwell wrote:Power is not a means; it is an end. One does not establish a dictatorship in order to safeguard a revolution; one makes the revolution in order to establish the dictatorship. The object of persecution is persecution. The object of torture is torture. The object of power is power.
Mr. E. Monkey wrote:raptor wrote:Let me inject a note of reality.
This thread is talking about a country/power that is strong enough to build up an invasion force on our borders without our knowledge. A force so big and strong that they can physically invade and potentially occupy the continental US lower 48. Such a build up would take quite a while and a lot of sophisticated efforts at intelligence gathering.


Doc Torr wrote:I'd be interested to hear why so many people would bug out and leave all their shit rather than bug in. I mean, there's no way I'm bugging out in the first six hours. Even if my DD214 was framed on the wall, I got way more ammo at home (and food) than would be worth bugging out with.

Doc Torr wrote:MacAttack wrote:In a slightly fantasy world I can see an invasion happening.
.........
But this would take 20 to 30 years to sneak up on us.
And I can only see one nation with the will and eventual ability to pull it off. Even in 20 years.
But hey this is a fantasy idea right? Nothing to worry about for our children.
I sense your sarcasm. But no, this will not happen without a major shift in the US policy, sicne our stated foreign defense goal is to be ablke to conduct conventionalk or unconventional warfare on two different fronts at once. Believe me, no one in command seriously believes that a boot is ready to go to war.
phil_in_cs wrote:I used to think it was 'any day now', but after 30+ years I've gotten tired of holding my breath.


offcamber wrote:
bae wrote:Doc Torr wrote:I'd be interested to hear why so many people would bug out and leave all their shit rather than bug in. I mean, there's no way I'm bugging out in the first six hours. Even if my DD214 was framed on the wall, I got way more ammo at home (and food) than would be worth bugging out with.
I'm bugging in, after maybe arming a platoon or two of neighbors.
View out the window:
Tater Raider wrote:I welcome our new overlords with open arms.
And lube. Lots and lots of lube.
Tater Raider wrote:I welcome our new overlords with open arms.
And lube. Lots and lots of lube.

phil_in_cs wrote:I used to think it was 'any day now', but after 30+ years I've gotten tired of holding my breath.

Tater Raider wrote:But at the same time it depends on the situation. My kids are grown or nearly so, so my gene pool thing is done. I'm starting to get some health problems so I got that to look forward to as well. On top of that I'll do random stuff that makes people go, "Really?"
So pretty much if it went down I'd do what I do and go out in a blaze of glory. Possibly bodily fluids as well. Who knows?
George Orwell wrote:Power is not a means; it is an end. One does not establish a dictatorship in order to safeguard a revolution; one makes the revolution in order to establish the dictatorship. The object of persecution is persecution. The object of torture is torture. The object of power is power.

George Orwell wrote:Power is not a means; it is an end. One does not establish a dictatorship in order to safeguard a revolution; one makes the revolution in order to establish the dictatorship. The object of persecution is persecution. The object of torture is torture. The object of power is power.


Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests