"Walking Dead" Cable Series

Zombie and/or other Post-Apocalyptic related movies for us to study and know what not to do.

Moderator: ZS Global Moderators

Re: "Walking Dead" New Cable Series

Postby dogbane » Tue Mar 06, 2012 4:33 pm

Anyone know whether AMC will run a marathon before the season finale so I can catch up. I haven't seen anything but the season premiere and the episode where they "rescue" Randall from the fence.

AMC is tight-fisted with their episodes, so Hulu and Netflix don't have it yet.
Image: Foil Cookery
High Ground: House of Adair
"Do what you can, with what you have, where you are." - T.R.
"The truth does not change according to our ability to stomach it." - Flannery O'Connor
User avatar
dogbane
ZS Member
ZS Member
 
Posts: 12818
Joined: Sun Feb 10, 2008 10:44 pm
Location: Carolina Piedmont

Re: "Walking Dead" New Cable Series

Postby majorhavoc » Tue Mar 06, 2012 4:37 pm

dogbane wrote:Anyone know whether AMC will run a marathon before the season finale so I can catch up. I haven't seen anything but the season premiere and the episode where they "rescue" Randall from the fence.

AMC is tight-fisted with their episodes, so Hulu and Netflix don't have it yet.


I had better luck last season finding them online. Now I just bite the bullet and download the episodes for $1.99 a pop on Amazon. But I don't get AMC anyways, so it's worth it to me. I have no idea the next time AMC will run a series marathon.
User avatar
majorhavoc
ZS Donor
ZS Donor
 
Posts: 4538
Joined: Wed May 12, 2010 10:06 am
Location: Maine

Re: "Walking Dead" New Cable Series

Postby 3Fingas » Tue Mar 06, 2012 4:41 pm

dogbane wrote:Anyone know whether AMC will run a marathon before the season finale so I can catch up. I haven't seen anything but the season premiere and the episode where they "rescue" Randall from the fence.

AMC is tight-fisted with their episodes, so Hulu and Netflix don't have it yet.



Amazon.com has both seasons on "Instant Video" for $2.99/episode

Time Warner has it "On demand" for free if you subscribe to their digital cable package.
PEDZ - People for the Efficient Disposal of Zombies
.... It's a dirty job, but someone has got to do it.

I may not have been born in Texas, but I got here
just as fast as I could!

Image

Image
User avatar
3Fingas
* * * * *
 
Posts: 1060
Joined: Wed Sep 16, 2009 2:05 am
Location: Texas: "Land of Big Open Skies and Freedom-loving Patriots"

Re: "Walking Dead" New Cable Series

Postby majorhavoc » Tue Mar 06, 2012 4:42 pm

3Fingas wrote:
dogbane wrote:Anyone know whether AMC will run a marathon before the season finale so I can catch up. I haven't seen anything but the season premiere and the episode where they "rescue" Randall from the fence.

AMC is tight-fisted with their episodes, so Hulu and Netflix don't have it yet.



Amazon.com has both seasons on "Instant Video" for $2.99/episode

Time Warner has it "On demand" for free if you subscribe to their digital cable package.


$1.99 if you don't want HD.
User avatar
majorhavoc
ZS Donor
ZS Donor
 
Posts: 4538
Joined: Wed May 12, 2010 10:06 am
Location: Maine

Re: "Walking Dead" New Cable Series

Postby dogbane » Tue Mar 06, 2012 4:54 pm

No cable package in my house; only internet. My mom has basic cable next door, so if AMC runs it, I can watch. I might have to go the Amazon route if no marathons are pending.
Image: Foil Cookery
High Ground: House of Adair
"Do what you can, with what you have, where you are." - T.R.
"The truth does not change according to our ability to stomach it." - Flannery O'Connor
User avatar
dogbane
ZS Member
ZS Member
 
Posts: 12818
Joined: Sun Feb 10, 2008 10:44 pm
Location: Carolina Piedmont

Re: "Walking Dead" New Cable Series

Postby RickOShea » Tue Mar 06, 2012 5:24 pm

I'd bet real money that they will run a season 2 marathon leading up to the season finale. They'll probably have a season 1 marathon the day before that.
Image Image
squinty wrote:What? Damn I thought this was match.com. No wonder my profile didn't get any hits....
User avatar
RickOShea
ZS Lifetime Member
ZS Lifetime Member
 
Posts: 6027
Joined: Mon Jul 13, 2009 5:24 pm
Location: Gulf Coast, AL

Re: "Walking Dead" New Cable Series

Postby Raven927 » Tue Mar 06, 2012 7:14 pm

dogbane wrote:Anyone know whether AMC will run a marathon before the season finale so I can catch up. I haven't seen anything but the season premiere and the episode where they "rescue" Randall from the fence.

AMC is tight-fisted with their episodes, so Hulu and Netflix don't have it yet.



You didn't miss anything.
crypto wrote:The Ruger Hokey-Pokey

YOU PUT THE MAGAZINE IN
YOU TAKE THE MAGAZINE OUT
YOU TURN IT UPSIDE-DOWN AND THEN YOU SHAKE IT ALL ABOUT
YOU YELL SOME MOTHERFUCKERS THEN YOU BEAT THE SPRING BACK OUT
THATS-WHAT-ITS-ALL-ABOUT!
User avatar
Raven927
* * * * *
 
Posts: 1434
Joined: Mon Jul 18, 2005 12:22 pm
Location: Wilkes-Barre Pennsylvania

Re: "Walking Dead" New Cable Series

Postby ninja-elbow » Tue Mar 06, 2012 7:18 pm

RickOShea wrote:
ninja-elbow wrote: Looks like he was fitna kill Randall before Dale got in trouble.

It was a really quick scene and I didn't catch it until the second airring, but I kinda got the same feeling. Rick had already decided they would keep Randall in "custody"......So why was Dirty D hanging out in the barn (sharpening his blade?). :wink:


Dirty D had him hanging in some enclosure. Wad of rags in Randall's mouth and sharpening his knife. The whole tiem Randall was all, "Mmmmph, MMMMMMMppphhhhh!"
President ZSC011
Part Viking, Part Siamese
User avatar
ninja-elbow
ZS Global Moderator
ZS Global Moderator
 
Posts: 14126
Joined: Sun May 13, 2007 12:39 pm
Location: Portland, OR

Re: "Walking Dead" New Cable Series

Postby yossarian » Tue Mar 06, 2012 9:02 pm

I would have had a lot more respect for Dale if he'd loaded Randall into the Losebago and driven off into the sunset.


As far as Daryl, he's got daddy issues and he's playing them out with Rick. Rick is everything his own father wasn't; upstanding, fair, consistent, sober, monogamous etc. He's doing Rick's dirty work because he wants Rick's approval. His anti-social tendencies make him particularly good at the dirty work.
" So, brave knights,
if you do doubt your courage or your strength, come no further,
for death awaits you all with nasty, big, pointy teeth."
yossarian
ZS Member
ZS Member
 
Posts: 1626
Joined: Thu Jul 31, 2008 12:09 am

Re: "Walking Dead" New Cable Series

Postby Nycene » Tue Mar 06, 2012 9:09 pm

They should have shot randall when he was stuck on the fence. Barring that they should have interrogated him before engaging the catch and release plan. They should have found another release location after the two cop zombies made an appearance at the first location. Carl should not have been wandering around alone in the zombie infested forest. Dale should not have been wandering around alone, at night, in the zombie infested field. They have been aware the presence of another group of people, with questionable members for a while - and have not yet done anything to fortify the farm. They have made no plans for defending themselves from this threat. The group is not so much broken as it is stupid.

Sometimes it is better to make the wrong decision than none at all. I can not think of worse leadership than convincing the group of one plan (catch and release), flipping over and convincing them to go with another (execution) then flipping back to the original plan. I get it, keeping him around is a bad idea (after his encounters with daryl and Carl I am convinced he is a bad guy). Killing him for possible crimes is a bad idea (it feels wrong, morally). I don't know what they should do, but waffling and hand wringing is not going to help solve the problem or improve the morale of the group.
"If fifty million people say a foolish thing, it's still a foolish thing."
Bertrand Russell
User avatar
Nycene
*
 
Posts: 62
Joined: Sun Dec 03, 2006 9:46 pm
Location: Toronto

Re: "Walking Dead" New Cable Series

Postby coyotebc » Wed Mar 07, 2012 12:15 am

coyotebc wrote:Didn't see that coming and Dale was my favorite character.
Funny how responsible people that wouldn't let their kid walk to school alone during normal times, let him run amok during the zombie invasion.

Funny after putting some thought into this episode and the characters, turns out Dale isn't my favorite character Daryl is.
coyotebc
* * *
 
Posts: 473
Joined: Sun Jan 28, 2007 2:04 pm
Location: British Columbia

Re: "Walking Dead" New Cable Series

Postby coyotebc » Wed Mar 07, 2012 12:22 am

Gun_Nut_2k1 wrote:Um what was up with the Stealth Zombie? No growns or nothing? Why wasn't Dale looking around if he saw the spooky Moooving cow that the Zed just had for dinner? Wanted to beat many of the Characters over the head this one, but I enjoyed it.

Why would the zombie move away from a food source anyways?
Their prime function seems to be to eat.
coyotebc
* * *
 
Posts: 473
Joined: Sun Jan 28, 2007 2:04 pm
Location: British Columbia

Re: "Walking Dead" New Cable Series

Postby Mall Ninja » Wed Mar 07, 2012 1:13 am

coyotebc wrote:
Gun_Nut_2k1 wrote:Um what was up with the Stealth Zombie? No growns or nothing? Why wasn't Dale looking around if he saw the spooky Moooving cow that the Zed just had for dinner? Wanted to beat many of the Characters over the head this one, but I enjoyed it.

Why would the zombie move away from a food source anyways?
Their prime function seems to be to eat.


Even a zombie needs to take a dump now and then...
Maxim 24: Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from a big gun.
User avatar
Mall Ninja
* *
 
Posts: 145
Joined: Fri Aug 19, 2011 6:35 pm

Re: "Walking Dead" New Cable Series

Postby survivaljoe » Wed Mar 07, 2012 5:36 am

Anyone else notice this thread is really just 150 pages of us trying to justify a show that kinda (for lack of a better word) sucks. I admit I did it too now, analyzing the characters and the plot and what not, but the sooner this thing dies the better.
Its called the walking dead, not for the zombies, or our lovely group of survivors, but for the actual show itself. Its a shambler, stumbling along. Someone put it out of its misery and let's move on to something else. Like Firefly Season 2!
SurvivalJoe is on that...
Damn BlackBerry...
Again...
User avatar
survivaljoe
* * *
 
Posts: 314
Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2010 1:08 am
Location: 96744

Re: "Walking Dead" New Cable Series

Postby kbilly84 » Wed Mar 07, 2012 8:13 am

survivaljoe wrote:Anyone else notice this thread is really just 150 pages of us trying to justify a show that kinda (for lack of a better word) sucks. I admit I did it too now, analyzing the characters and the plot and what not, but the sooner this thing dies the better.
Its called the walking dead, not for the zombies, or our lovely group of survivors, but for the actual show itself. Its a shambler, stumbling along. Someone put it out of its misery and let's move on to something else. Like Firefly Season 2!

After the demise of Dale, I'm with you. As someone pointed out earlier, if Daryl goes before Lori/Shane/etc, I'm done.
"An armed society is a polite society. Manners are good when one may have to back up his acts with his life."
-Robert A. Heinlein
User avatar
kbilly84
ZS Member
ZS Member
 
Posts: 1166
Joined: Thu Jul 07, 2011 8:24 am
Location: Planet Earth (or so I'm told)

Re: "Walking Dead" New Cable Series

Postby Eklipsis » Wed Mar 07, 2012 8:45 am

aww Debbie Downers

hate to be that guy but if you dont like it ...dont watch...dont want to analyze/discuss it...dont participate..

I for one love the show. People are going to die that you like, people are going to die that you dont like. They have to have a story or it wont keep anyone attention for long. Thats why zombie movies are only an hour and a half long, you only can watch them getting eaten for so long, you need substance.



***EDIT**
As far as Daryl getting killed..he has the same chance as anyone. Need I remind you of his horse incident. Everyone is just one stupid decision away from being zombie chow.
Image

If you're prepared for the Zombie Apocalypse...blizzards are a breeze.
User avatar
Eklipsis
*
 
Posts: 40
Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2011 4:18 pm
Location: West MI

Re: "Walking Dead" New Cable Series

Postby Toothpick Jim » Wed Mar 07, 2012 9:23 am

Eklipsis wrote:aww Debbie Downers

hate to be that guy but if you dont like it ...dont watch...dont want to analyze/discuss it...dont participate..

I for one love the show. People are going to die that you like, people are going to die that you dont like. They have to have a story or it wont keep anyone attention for long. Thats why zombie movies are only an hour and a half long, you only can watch them getting eaten for so long, you need substance.


+1

I think it's great (for a TV show). It is the only non- military channel, TLC, discovery program etc that I regularly watch.

Remember, it's just a soap with zombies, it's not a documentary.

Other options on Sunday night?? There's always the Food Chanel... Cupcake Wars ...... :gonk:

I don't always watch TV, but when I do...I prefer The Walking Dead
Shit Happens....
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Image

Now...how about a big hug for your old pal Merle....
User avatar
Toothpick Jim
* *
 
Posts: 149
Joined: Tue Jan 17, 2012 8:29 am
Location: Wisconsin

Re: "Walking Dead" New Cable Series

Postby majorhavoc » Wed Mar 07, 2012 9:35 am

kbilly84 wrote:After the demise of Dale, I'm with you. As someone pointed out earlier, if Daryl goes before Lori/Shane/etc, I'm done.

This isn't a spoiler because I honestly don't know what is going to happen. Hell, Daryl didn't even exist in the GN. But if your expections are that certain people should/deserve/must outlive others, you might as well quit watching now.

It's been said and said again in this thread and elsewhere that a hallmark of Kirkland's storytelling is that favored characters can and do die. To say you'll quit watching if a particular character dies, or dies before another, essentially means that you do not want to be watching a Kirkland TV drama. Period.

Sorry man, but in this particular vision of the zombie apocalypse, that's just the way it is.
User avatar
majorhavoc
ZS Donor
ZS Donor
 
Posts: 4538
Joined: Wed May 12, 2010 10:06 am
Location: Maine

Re: "Walking Dead" New Cable Series

Postby kbilly84 » Wed Mar 07, 2012 9:54 am

majorhavoc wrote:This isn't a spoiler because I honestly don't know what is going to happen. Hell, Daryl didn't even exist in the GN. But if your expectionations are that certain people should/deserve/must outlive others, you might as well quit watching now.

It's been said and said again in this thread and elsewhere that a hallmark of Kirkland's storytelling is that favored characters can and do die. To say you'll quit watching if a particular character dies, or dies before another, essentially means that you do not want to be wating a Kirkland TV drama. Period.

Sorry man, but in this particular vision of the zombie apocalypse, that's just the way it is.

I get all that. My point was more one of general disgust with how this season has gone. The substance (as someone referred to it) is all but gone. At this point the only reason for me to keep watching is to see what happens with Daryl. I did not mean that he deserves to outlive anyone. Just that his storyline is the only one left that I care about.

Now, if the action picks up, and we start getting some real excitement.....

I guess I should have clarified more. Did not mean to start a flame war.
"An armed society is a polite society. Manners are good when one may have to back up his acts with his life."
-Robert A. Heinlein
User avatar
kbilly84
ZS Member
ZS Member
 
Posts: 1166
Joined: Thu Jul 07, 2011 8:24 am
Location: Planet Earth (or so I'm told)

Re: "Walking Dead" New Cable Series

Postby Eklipsis » Wed Mar 07, 2012 10:34 am

It's all good..Daryl is my favorite too...

I think the reason the action slowed (meaning less walkers) is because they wanted you to get the feeling that the farm is a safe haven. Anytime they get away is when they run into a horde of walkers. So, based on sneak peeks of the next episode/the arrival of Randall and potential threat of others/Dale killed in the field, your starting to get the feeling maybe this isnt such a safe place after all and there is a real threat. Maybe its time to get moving again? As far as I know they dont stay at the farm forever at least in the GN.
Image

If you're prepared for the Zombie Apocalypse...blizzards are a breeze.
User avatar
Eklipsis
*
 
Posts: 40
Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2011 4:18 pm
Location: West MI

Re: "Walking Dead" New Cable Series

Postby catalyst » Wed Mar 07, 2012 10:46 am

Eklipsis wrote:It's all good..Daryl is my favorite too...

I think the reason the action slowed (meaning less walkers) is because they wanted you to get the feeling that the farm is a safe haven. Anytime they get away is when they run into a horde of walkers. So, based on sneak peeks of the next episode/the arrival of Randall and potential threat of others/Dale killed in the field, your starting to get the feeling maybe this isnt such a safe place after all and there is a real threat. Maybe its time to get moving again? As far as I know they dont stay at the farm forever at least in the GN.


I get this feeling that the reason the action slowed is budget related - I think this will come back to bite them in the ass. I am also getting a bit sick of the drama-fest that this show is turning in to.

They are taking characters down illogical roads. So dale had to die. Fine. Heck, I'm ok with him dead, but don't off the guy from a walker that he should have interrupted in the middle of feeding on a cow. This is some of the final survivors in a zombie apocalypse. The cautious guy who sits a top the RV all the time isn't going to take a stroll and be unprepared for an attack. Dale was not my favorite character by any means, but at least give the guy some more credit. Let him walk up on the zed, line up the shot, and have his gun make a loud audible "click" (the loudest cick you can ever hear) as his gun misfires, only to have the zombie also hear it, and then attack dale.

I don't want to be insulted by watching these people act like idiots, because if they were, we'd have not made it past episode 3 or 4 of season 1.

And Carl... what are they doing with his character, because at this point, I'm starting to second-guess the writers on his development - and how idiotic they make Rick and his wife look as parents - who never let the kid out of their sight early on.
User avatar
catalyst
* *
 
Posts: 225
Joined: Thu Dec 16, 2010 8:53 am
Location: Michigan

Re: "Walking Dead" New Cable Series

Postby kbilly84 » Wed Mar 07, 2012 11:08 am

catalyst wrote:I get this feeling that the reason the action slowed is budget related - I think this will come back to bite them in the ass. I am also getting a bit sick of the drama-fest that this show is turning in to.

They are taking characters down illogical roads. So dale had to die. Fine. Heck, I'm ok with him dead, but don't off the guy from a walker that he should have interrupted in the middle of feeding on a cow. This is some of the final survivors in a zombie apocalypse. The cautious guy who sits a top the RV all the time isn't going to take a stroll and be unprepared for an attack. Dale was not my favorite character by any means, but at least give the guy some more credit. Let him walk up on the zed, line up the shot, and have his gun make a loud audible "click" (the loudest cick you can ever hear) as his gun misfires, only to have the zombie also hear it, and then attack dale.

I don't want to be insulted by watching these people act like idiots, because if they were, we'd have not made it past episode 3 or 4 of season 1.

And Carl... what are they doing with his character, because at this point, I'm starting to second-guess the writers on his development - and how idiotic they make Rick and his wife look as parents - who never let the kid out of their sight early on.

This.
"An armed society is a polite society. Manners are good when one may have to back up his acts with his life."
-Robert A. Heinlein
User avatar
kbilly84
ZS Member
ZS Member
 
Posts: 1166
Joined: Thu Jul 07, 2011 8:24 am
Location: Planet Earth (or so I'm told)

Re: "Walking Dead" New Cable Series

Postby majorhavoc » Wed Mar 07, 2012 11:25 am

catalyst wrote:
Eklipsis wrote:I think the reason the action slowed (meaning less walkers) is because they wanted you to get the feeling that the farm is a safe haven.


I get this feeling that the reason the action slowed is budget related - I think this will come back to bite them in the ass.

They are taking characters down illogical roads. So dale had to die. Fine. Heck, I'm ok with him dead, but don't off the guy from a walker that he should have interrupted in the middle of feeding on a cow. This is some of the final survivors in a zombie apocalypse. The cautious guy who sits a top the RV all the time isn't going to take a stroll and be unprepared for an attack.

And Carl... what are they doing with his character, because at this point, I'm starting to second-guess the writers on his development - and how idiotic they make Rick and his wife look as parents - who never let the kid out of their sight early on.


Really good points. I enjoy the drama/character development, but I agree the stately pacing of this season is beginning to sour what made Season One such a hoot. Take the latest episode: I appreciate all the individual elements: Daryl playing the heavy with Randall, Dale lobbying the group to show some mercy, Hershal bequeathing the pocket watch to Glenn (a very moving little scene, IMO), and Carl's descent into amorality. But for the love of god, the timeline for that episode was just one day, literally sun up to sun down, dealing with a single central issue: what to do with Randall?

And yeah, they could have offed Dale in a way that didn't make him look like he died a fool.

I think we're starting to see some of the limitations of the writers for this show, or at least this season. They're getting mired in character exposition and they're not even doing it that well; they keep misfiring. Where they're trying to show Rick wrestling with ethical decisions, what we see on the TV screen is maddening indecisiveness. Where they want to convey Dale's passionate defense of preserving humanity, it comes across as meddling and verbal bullying. And where they're trying to demonstrate that Carl's moral underpinnings are starting to shake apart, we instead see an idiotic kid who is screwing up right and left.

I'm in this for the duration, but the sooner that farm gets attacked - by walkers or Randall's group, frankly I don't care which - the better.
User avatar
majorhavoc
ZS Donor
ZS Donor
 
Posts: 4538
Joined: Wed May 12, 2010 10:06 am
Location: Maine

Re: "Walking Dead" New Cable Series

Postby Velociryan » Wed Mar 07, 2012 11:33 am

Some of you guys are starting to sound like this guy.
Image
User avatar
Velociryan
*
 
Posts: 55
Joined: Tue Nov 16, 2010 4:14 pm
Location: Colorado

PreviousNext

Return to Zombie Training Films

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest