
Moderator: ZS Global Moderators

Doc Torr wrote:gillis wrote:I avoid acu camo pattern or any current ARMY fatigues. I was raised to never ever "impersonate" a soldier if your not a soldier. That honor should go only to them and I do believe that... However I am not against buying milsur if it is the best for a pouch I need for a bob or backpacking trip... Do I frown upon civs wearing acu to purposely tout around acting mil? Yes!
I'm not x-mil but try to show respect where I can. I wear a lot of real-tree camo.. hehe. hey this might be my chance to ask a question I have always wanted an answer for.
Does it ever bother an enlistee or x-mil to see a guy decked out in "real-tree" camo? I wouldn't think so. Sometimes I feal bad when I see someone with a military licence plate pass my truck that is decked out in "deer hunter" type stickers. Hopefully my support the troops sticker says enough.
No. Realtree says hunter. I get pissed when I see .civ wearing active military pattern to go hang out somewhere (yeah, you in NYC with the MARPAT cut offs. If you ever read this, you suck.) or soldiers wearing their ACUs out. I'd understand if, say, there was a base nearby, and maybe they were on working hours, but if you're gonna wear a uniform to the bar, don't wear a utility uniform.
The caveat to the above is "rangetime" which is the magical time where I don't care what you wear, so much as where your muzzle points.
ais4122 wrote:ref the tatoos. When I had initially joined the service I had really wanted to get Crossed Rifles - US Infantry on my shoulder blade. Decided against it, but now wouldnt have minded having that reminder with me for the rest of my life. But Ive been out over 15yrs and its way past my statue of limitation.
oldsoldier wrote:I havent worn a pair of jeans since before 2000. Seriously. I have worn cargo pants, of one sort or another, or dress pants, as appropriate, and stay away from jeans. For me, its just choice-I like pockets. I havent put a wallet in a back pocket in I dont know HOW long. I wear 5.11 pants-I wore them when they were strictly climbing clothes, before they became "cool". I wear them now. I like them, they are comfy, and I enjoy roomy pockets. Yes, I carry both a pocketknife and a flashlight in them. And my pistol too. Never been questioned on it. I am also of the ilk that, if I see you have a clip knife & flashlight, I would assume you are armed-but, I dont care, because its not those folks I am concerned with. Its the sketchy tweaker, or folks in the nastier parts of town. Even then, it doesnt concern me what they wear. Just where their hands are, and how they are acting. Clothing plays an absolute last into all of that.

jare-3 wrote:AKFTW wrote:I have 2 of the LAPG tactical pants,
^^^This^^^ I love those friggin pants. They are about as comfy as comfy gets.

Akin wrote:jare-3 wrote:AKFTW wrote:I have 2 of the LAPG tactical pants,
^^^This^^^ I love those friggin pants. They are about as comfy as comfy gets.
What are they? *curious*
docdredd wrote:those pandas need to harden the fuck up


AKFTW wrote:Akin wrote:jare-3 wrote:AKFTW wrote:I have 2 of the LAPG tactical pants,
^^^This^^^ I love those friggin pants. They are about as comfy as comfy gets.
What are they? *curious*
http://www.lapolicegear.com/basic-operator-pant.html
Good stuff. The Sierra color is my favorite, it's a really nice earthy brown with a hint of ranger green in there


Kommander wrote:So no one else has had problems with their LAPG pants falling apart or with that seam on the crotch gusset?



MADic wrote:What bugs me more than people wearing legitimate tactical clothes as a fashion item is fashion companies co-opting military clothing and reselling brand name, "fashionized" versions for hundreds of dollars. Like THIS JACKET, for $583 dollars.
Kommander wrote:MADic wrote:What bugs me more than people wearing legitimate tactical clothes as a fashion item is fashion companies co-opting military clothing and reselling brand name, "fashionized" versions for hundreds of dollars. Like THIS JACKET, for $583 dollars.
To be fair the reason that it costs so much is not because its super cool tactical but rather that the BBC is nothing more than an outlet for conspicuous consumption. No one buys that crap because they think it's worth it, they buy it to show off that they can afford it, never mind the fact that they are essentially buying a rebranded Timex for the price of a Rolex.


offcamber wrote:Kommander wrote:So no one else has had problems with their LAPG pants falling apart or with that seam on the crotch gusset?
Yep, all mine have fallen apart, but they are so cheap I just buy another pair when they start to unravel.
skelco wrote:edit: ok, maybe I'm being a dick. The bright side is you can make fun of my skinny jeans and cholo shorts
Vicarious_Lee wrote:If Nutnfacny were an 8-ounce chicken fried steak, he'd come with 72 ounces of batter around it that you have to slash through to get to it.

Czechnology wrote:skelco wrote:edit: ok, maybe I'm being a dick. The bright side is you can make fun of my skinny jeans and cholo shorts
Oh I needed your permission? Crap.


skelco wrote:I don't recall anyone ever asking permission to call me a rude name.
Got a pair of those LA Police Gear pantz, they seem pretty nice... look out for the aging hipster mall ninja
Vicarious_Lee wrote:If Nutnfacny were an 8-ounce chicken fried steak, he'd come with 72 ounces of batter around it that you have to slash through to get to it.

RoneKiln wrote:I grew up next to, and am now once again living next to a very large Military Base. Tactical and camo gear is EVERYWHERE. It was even more prevalent when I was a kid. Everyone had a few pairs of surplus camo pants and a jacket. There really is no value in taking notice of it here. I have a lot of family and friends in the military. I've never heard of any of them ever taking notice of someone not in the military wearing surplus or tactical gear. Of course, the way people around here wear it, it's obviously not a complete uniform or any sort of attempt to pretend to be. I know they hate it when people start telling lies about having been in the military (especially special forces), so I guess they might take notice if it looked like the person was trying to impersonate a soldier with that kind of gear.
For over a decade I lived in a college town. If someone was wearing 5.11 clothes it meant they were a hardcore rock climber or hiker. More often than not they were vehemenently anti-gun and anti-violence for any reason.
In that same town, someone with a knife and flashlight clipped to their pocket were almost guaranteed to be a computer tech or theatre geek. The likelihood they might be carrying a handgun was nearly nonexistant.

Kommander wrote:The other day at work one of our newer ex military employees asked me if I was Army or Marines based solely on my Hazard 4 slingpack with attached shemagh. I told him that he was making too many assumptions on too little evidence. I dislike being mistaken for police or military for a variety of reasons and this made me want to throw my pack in the river and get a hippie bag like a Timbuk2 messenger. I do reserve the right to wear my West Point Oakleys and Multicam hat whenever I want but that's because they were gifts from brother who is a fourth year West Point cadet.

Return to Personal Experiences
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest