Mindset while carrying

Training questions, approaches and reports

Moderators: Dave_M, ZS Global Moderators

Mindset while carrying

Postby nimdabew » Sun Feb 05, 2012 4:28 pm

I saw this on another board that linked to ARFCOM. While I don't agree with 100% of the post, there is a lot of good information in there and suggest that you at least read it. I am glad I did.

http://www.ar15.com/forums/t_1_5/128548 ... tml&page=1

ately in GD we have had two different board members find themselves looking down the barrel of a gun along with the GF of another ARFCOMMER in street robberies. Also Blitz308 got shot all to pieces last year.

While many say it is better to be lucky than good, no one is lucky every time. In this post I am going to attempt to provide some insight into street encounters. Other may have different viewpoints. I am not here to argue. I will say some of the comments I have seen posted in the threads about this sort of matter make me realize that while some ARFCOMMERS are clearly street veterans others are not. This is really for those who are not.

Background

First, my info. I worked in the street of one of America's most violent, dangerous cities for 15 years. I usually worked in the worst part of that city. I spent 15 years in patrol. I liked patrol. It was wild. Most of the time I worked in areas covered in ghetto. By that I mean large housing projects combined with run down slum housing. I have worked all shifts. Later I became an investigator including a robbery investigator. I have spent countless hours in interrogation rooms talking to hold up men. I know them. I am still an investigator but have quit playing the Robbery game because my family was starting to forget what I looked like.

The Enemy

Some may object to me calling hold up men "the enemy". You can call them whatever you like. I can assure you however they are as deadly an enemy as you will find anywhere but the battlefield. Even many soldiers probably lack the viciousness and utter disregard for life most hold up men possess.

No one wakes up in the morning one day and decides to become an armed robber. It is a gradual process that requires some experience and desensitizing. Before a man will pick up a gun and threaten to kill people who have done him no harm in order to get their usually meager possessions he has to get comfortable with some things.

He has to get used to seeing others as objects for him to exploit. He has to accept he may be killed while robbing. He has to accept the felony conviction for Robbery will haunt him all his life. He has to accept he may need to kill a completely innocent person to get away with his crime.

This is a process that starts with stealing candy at the corner store as a child. It progresses through bigger property crimes that may also involve violence. But one day G gets tired of selling his stolen property for nothing and decides it would be better to steal cash. Cut out all that tiresome sales stuff.


Keep in mind many petty thieves, auto burglars, residential and commercial burglars, paper thieves, and hustlers will get to that point and decide not to become armed robbers. Most will. It is a special group of outliers who decide threatening to kill people for a few dollars is the way to go.

Once a man starts armed robbing he has crossed a line most won't. Don't forget that when you are looking these bastards in the eye. Their decision to kill you is already made. Your life means nothing to him. Only his does. His sole motivation for not killing you is he doesn't want a murder case. He has already accepted he may pick one up though.

We hunt hold up men around the clock once they are identified. We send teams of fire breathing fence jumper/door kickers to find them. We will bring their mother to the office and convince her she is going to jail if we don't have Junior in our office in an hour. We have her call her son crying hysterically for him to turn himself in before she is arrested and held without bond as a material witness and her home seized for harboring him. Most of the time they won't. Fuck their own momma.

We will hit all Juniors friends and family's houses. We make it so no one will harbor him. He is so hot no one will let him in their house or even talk on the phone with him. We put money on him so he knows he is right to be betrayed and set up. We do this because of one thing.

That thing is they WILL kill someone if they keep robbing. That is why the city is willing to pay all the overtime. They don't want the murders. Think about that when you see Junior coming. The more robberies he does the closer he is to killing someone. Maybe you.

The guys who hit you on the street are gang members. They are Gangster Disciples, Vice Lords, Crips, Sureonos, many others. They do not see themselves as part of society. The street is all they know. They don't expect to live long or stay out of prison. They take a delight in your fear and suffering. They are warped individuals for the most part. They can be extremely dangerous.

One time we were locking up a hold up man and having a conversation about how they target their victims. I was saying they pick easy ones, another guy was saying they preferred easy ones but would take anybody.

I pointed out a uniform Officer there was an NFL size guy to that hold up man. Frankly the dude was a monster. I asked hold up man if he would rob him. He said "If I needed the money".





You

Chances are good you are a law abiding person except for maybe a little light weed smoking and maybe driving a little drunk every once in a while. Most of your life you have been taught to be nice and don't point guns at people. You are the exact opposite of your enemy who was taught just the opposite. Remember a lot of street life is like prison life. Who's the man is everything. Violence is the currency of the street.

You do not possess total disregard for the lives of others and do not want to kill anyone. You are concerned about the ramifications of shooting someone. Your family, your possessions and finances on the line. Your enemy has none of these concerns.

The laws that keep you from carrying your gun in bars or where ever mean nothing to your enemy. Your reluctance to shoot someone works to is advantage. His greater experience in street violence and the element of surprise is on his side.

Everyone should call their local FBI office and get a copy of Law Enforcement Officers Killed and Assaulted. When it first came out it was ground breaking because it demonstrated to academics and other elites what street police knew all along. What did it show in interviews with cop killers? Nice guys finish dead. That's right. Most of those offenders commented that the Officer they killed set himself up to be killed because of reluctance to use force early in the encounter.

You can probably find it on line now. A lot of the victim Officers were a lot like a lot of other people, normal people. They were the opposite of their enemy.

Am I advocating becoming the enemy? No. I am saying the person who is robbing you has certain traits, attitudes, and background. That is all.

Dynamics of Encounters

Hold up men target victims on the street in an impulsive, opportunistic manner. They see someone and make a quick judgment call on whether to rob them. The time between when you are targeted and they are on you isn't long. Therefore, situational awareness is everything.

If you see G coming you are in good shape. If you don't you will be the victim who says "He came out of nowhere". No he didn't. There are many tricks to watching out but simply watching your back is the main thing. Watch your back. If you do it enough it becomes second nature and you won't even realize you are doing it.

Watching out is great but unfortunately many self defense courses stop there. You have parked you car in a well lit area, are aware of your surroundings, and looky here, here comes three guys across the parking lot and they start to kind of fan out.

When you lock eyes with G the very first thing you need to do it indicate you have a weapon. It doesn't matter if you do or not. If you are a woman put your gun hand in your purse and keep it there. If you are a man fan your shirt or coat tail with your gun hand. Make it clear to dude you are mentally prepared to draw and making sure your gun is clear. This will many times result in an about face by dude. It is the single best robbery avoidance tactic IMHO.

Not long ago I was walking down the sidewalk in my town to go get my car. I was holding a folding chair in my gun hand. A car slow rolled past me with 4 heads in it. The guys in the back seat turned around as they went by looking at me. They went a little farther and U turned in the street.

Here they come back. As they started to slow down I looked at them with as contemptuous a look as I could muster and switched the chair to my left hand and flicked my shirt tail with my right hand. They just drove on mad dogging me.

In another case I was at a Christmas party and walked a girl to her car about 3 am. As we said our good-byes two guys were walking across the parking lot. One went behind a dumpster. I though he was peeing. He came out from behind the dumpster with a bottle.

As they got closer I stepped clear of that girl and unzipped my jacket at those two guys. When I did the guy threw down the bottle and they walked by cussing at me. If someone challenges you after you indicate you are armed say "I don't have a gun". Then they will know you do.

Here is an opposite story. A girl my brother knows was walking her dog when a guy approached her. She was polite. Mistake. He talked to her about the dog and said she had pretty hair and reached out and touched her hair. She did not slap his hand down or aggressively object. Mistake. He asked her if her dog bit and she said "No". At that time he slapped the shit out of her, drug her into a wooded area, and raped her.

The answer in the street is always "No". Can I ask you something? No. Do you have a cigarette? No. Can you tell me what time it is? No. The answer is always "No". Don't be nice. Stop the encounter as soon as it starts.

When to draw

Despite warnings I often see on the Net I have yet to encounter an instance in which a hold up man called the police to report his intended victim threatened to shoot him. Thugs do not want to come into contact with the police. They may already be wanted or realize chances are good they have been identified in a recent robbery. Or what ever. They are not going to call the police if you draw on them.



Supposed two guys are approaching you in a parking lot and do the classic fan out maneuver. You indicate you have a weapon by clearing your gun hand and fanning your jacket at them. They are not discouraged. DRAW!

I am not saying you should pull your gun out, assume a Weaver stance, and scream "That's close enough motherfuckers!" What I am saying is draw your gun and hold it beside your leg as you start to move to cover. I am very fond of telephone poles. Anything will do though. They will see this. They will remember they have to be somewhere else. They will not call the police.

Then you can just put your gun back in the holster and go back to whatever you were doing like nothing happened. Why? Because nothing did happen. A happening is when shots are fired.

Do not hesitate to draw. If you are somewhere you are supposed to be and someone appears who is not supposed to be there like a closed business show him the end of your gun. Could it be Mother Teresa looking for her lost cat behind your closed business? No it is some motherfucker up to no good. He won't call the police to report he was prowling a location when a guy ran him off.

When to shoot

The time to shoot is immediately upon seeing his weapon. You are not a police man who has to try to arrest the guy. No need to scream at him. No exposure while you yell for him to drop the gun.

In deer hunting the experienced hunter takes the first good shot. May not be the perfect shot but it never is. Novices pass up a doable shot waiting for a better shot and then the deer is gone. Take the first good shot you are offered. Hopefully your alertness and hostile cues will prevent you ever having to fire. But once you see his weapon, shoot.

If a guy is coming at you with a gun in his hand shoot him. Shoot him right then. If you don't shoot first you may not shoot at all. I have known more than one person who was shot and received life changing injuries and also shot their attacker. Their only regret was not shooting sooner. Like Bill Jordan said "Nothing disturbs your enemy's aim like a slug delivered to the belt buckle area".

Guns and weapons

The handgun is the best weapon you can carry easily. I understand it is not always possible to have one due to laws, restrictions, whatever. I am not telling anyone to disregard laws about carrying weapons. Each person has to decide for themselves what they are comfortable with. I will say there is no substitute for a pistol when you need one.


Also if you can not be trusted with a pistol after a few drinks you can't be trusted with a pistol period. Booze is liquid bad judgment no doubt but it shouldn't make you into a damn moron. If you are a moron sober I don't know what to tell you.

Types of guns and ammo are always debated and probably always will be. I have seen people shot with all common calibers. My conclusion is if you hit someone between the collar bone and the tip of their ribs three times with anything, they are handled. Bigger is better but something is better than nothing. Get your front sight on his shirt and stay on him as long as he is standing with whatever gun you have.

Just have a gun with sure fire ammo. Draw early and fire immediately upon seeing his weapon. That course of action is about all you can do to up your odds of ending things favorably. Guns like the Ruger LC9, SIG 239, Glock 26/27 are examples of guns small enough to carry but with enough power and capacity to be useful. Do not be afraid to use a French Lebelle if that is the only gun you have. A gun is a gun. I like a Glock 19.

Training

We all want the best training. It can be expensive if you are having to pay for it and it can be hard to find the time to do it. There is a whole lot of BS out there. What can you do? First, pistol handling is not rocket surgery. If you will learn the basics and practice on your own you can be fine. Smooth draw, quick pairs, reload. If you know those things well you can be OK.

I know a young man who shot down two hold up men in 2010 at very close range while he and his GF were walking home from the store. He in Wyatt Earp like fashion ignored the fire coming from the gunman and killed him and wounded his accomplice. He nor his GF were injured. He like many was willing to give them the money until he picked up on nonverbal cues that because of his GF they were not quite satisfied with the money. He had a Glock 27.

He had only the most basic of training in gun handling but did do some draws and some dry fire a couple times a week and live fired maybe once a month. That basic skill combined with knowing what to do was enough. He shot at the first possible moment despite having let the guys get the drop on them. When the gunman turned his head because a car drove by that was the opening. A split second is a long time sometimes.

Work on some one hand shooting at close range. That is a skill not as popular as it once was and you want to use two hands when you can. Often you can find yourself doing something with your off hand though so be able to shoot with one hand out to 5 yards or so.




After

If it comes to pass you are forced to shoot someone do not feel bad. When the police come just tell them a guy threatened you with deadly force and you were forced to fire. I know there are bad police out there in some parts of the country who don't support self defense. I can't help you with that.

Do not talk to them until you have your attorney present. Now most young guys don't have an attorney on retainer and you may have no idea who to call. That is OK. You will figure it out but in the mean time don't talk about what happened other than to say you were forced to fire. You don't have to be an asshole just remember wait for your attorney.

Hopefully you will not give a statement for a couple days. Remember if you are put in jail that doesn't mean you are charged. Most places can hold you 48 or 72 hours on a felony before charging you or letting you go. Breath deep and get an attorney.

Expect to never get your gun back. You may get it back one day but maybe not. Do not buy expensive guns for the street. Buy yourself a nice sporting gun if you want a nice gun. Keep your street guns basic. The factory Model 10 Smith and the GI 45 have done a lot of work over the years and aren't fancy.

Worlds

We all live in different worlds. My world is filled with felons and gang members. Violence is common place. No one would be surprised if one of their friends called and said they shot a hold up man at a place of business or parking lot. In the past when I made calls the fact that the guy who is beating his GF is also on parole for 2nd degree murder flavored my world.

You may live in a smaller, less violent place where shootings seldom occur and it would be a rare to shoot a hold up man. I envy you and will be moving to a place like your town as soon as I can.

But be advised no matter where you are a hold man is going to be about the same. Whether he is a home boy or a guy who just exited the interstate into your town and needs some quick money. He is going to have a vicious streak and no regard for your life. Treat him like he treats you.

Giving them the money, doing what they say, all that may work but there is no guarantee. If you have never read Jeff Cooper's book The Principles of Personal Defense I suggest you order a copy immediately. It is a short book but summarizes a lot of important things.

Last year we had a trial here regarding an armed robbery that occurred. Three or four guys took a young couple from a parking garage near a college out by some railroad tracks where they raped, shot, and beat them. Their lives will never be the same.

The lesser thugs all turned on the trigger man at trial. The trigger man's statement in the paper was after all that had happened he felt like he was a victim. Think about that. That is the mindset you are up against.
Thanks Anianna!
Image

12_Gauge_Chimp wrote:I say when Wee Drop visits the US, we make her ride a goat. You know, like those little monkey cowboys they have at some rodeos. :lol:
nimdabew
* * * * *
 
Posts: 9242
Joined: Fri Aug 29, 2008 8:27 am
Location: Seattle, WA

Re: Mindset while carrying

Postby nimdabew » Sun Feb 05, 2012 4:30 pm

Another part in the thread later

http://www.ar15.com/forums/t_1_5/128548 ... #i32260644

One page six of the thread in the OP:

The following is a compilation of articles from Skip Gochenour. The full articles can be viewed at:
http://www.teddytactical.com/index_files/Page451.htm

Victim and Predator Behavior

Points for practitioners(i.e. CHLs) to consider are:

1. Most Violent Criminal Actors (VCA) will attempt to get in close proximity to their prey. Predators avoid stand off engagements.

2. If the potential victim does not have a defensive weapon on his/her person, there is little likelihood of being able to move sufficiently to obtain one.

3. If the potential victim does not have some type of rudimentary plan for such an event, there is little likelihood of being able to develop one in time to defeat the aggressor.

4. When awakened by a predator, potential victims tend to awaken immediately.

5. When awakened by a predator, anticipate that you and your family will be injured. Predators invading homes at night do so with the understanding that they will injure anyone who attempts to stop them from achieving their goals.

6. Predators invading homes during daylight hours generally tend to avoid physical contact if at all possible.



Predatory behavior has seven distinct phases:

1. The hunting ground selection. Where are targets of the desired type
located?

2. Specific target selection. The target must indicate a reasonable likelihood of having the desired items, e.g. cash, jewelry, sex, etc.

3. Evaluation of the potential target. Is the target aware of the intention of the predator and can he/she be seduced into ignoring normal common sense actions? Can the potential target be surprised by the attackers actions and will they fail to recover adequately to thwart the attacker?

4. The bump or the testing of the potential target. Many predators will make an initial contact to determine if the target recognizes the threat.

5. Positioning to execute the act. Moving to the most desirable position from which to successfully execute the attack.

6. Running the attack tape. Checking the area one last time while visualizing what they will do and the response of the victim. Knowledge of what action(s) the victim will take is useful in developing the strategy for the attack.

7. Executing the attack.


In reading the situation (confrontation), there are three considerations:

1. Motive

A. Instrumental

· The violence offered is an instrument to acquire a goal.
· He wants your wallet.
· He may be establishing a reputation, especially when involved with a cohort group. This VCA is particularly dangerous.
· VCA with this motive model is most susceptible to forming a restraining judgment.
· His weapons skills are more likely to be poor. He must get close.
· He will have a strategy for getting close. The strategy will likely make use of his chosen attack venue.
· His weapons are more likely to be of poor quality and poorly maintained. Systems are not likely to be redundant. If armed with a firearm, he is not likely to have a supplemental ammo supply. The weapon may not be fully loaded.
· He is very unlikely to use a conventional weapons transport system.
· He is less likely to be interested in a fight.
· He plans on an escape and to be unharmed.
· Most likely for economic benefit.

B. Expressive

· Violence offered is an expression. It is to set the world right as the VCA sees it.
· He is particularly unlikely to be susceptible to forming restraining judgments.
· He is very likely to transfer his hostility to anyone he interprets as part of the wrong he is trying to right.
· There is a greater likelihood his weapons skills will be good.
· His weapons are more likely to be of good quality and well maintained. He will likely have multiple weapons and additional ammo. He may even have breaching capabilities.
· He is much more likely to fight.
· He is less likely to plan on escaping the venue uninjured or alive unless he has other killing venues planned.
· He is there about honor as he sees it.

C. Instrumental/expressive

· The incident begins as an instrumental occurrence and shifts to an expressive incident.
· His interactive interpretive model will be primed to accept offense at your actions that do not conform to his view deference to him and his position. He is looking for an opportunity to see an affront to his honor.
· Throwing your wallet will get you shot. Such techniques, as written about by experts are based on looking at robbery reports, not talking to killers.

2. Context

WEAPONS SYSTEMS AND THE LIKELIHOOD OF EMPLOYMENT The greater the intimidation factor of the weapons system, the less likely it is to be employed. The less the intimidation factor of the weapons system, the greater the likelihood it will be employed.

This observation applies predominately to the instrumentally and instrumentally/expressively motivated VCA.

· Firearms rate of use is in the single digits.
· Edged weapon employment is about 1 in 4.
· Impact weapons are about 1 in 2.
· Empty hands are almost 1 in 1.

In a recent medical study of assault injuries done in England shows that the extent of injury and permanence of injury is greater from the shod foot than from firearms and edged weapons.

The greater the number of antagonists, the more likely there will be an assault regardless of your cooperation. If there are three or more antagonists an actual attack is almost assured.

When confronted, you must operate on a Plus 1 premise. No matter how many confront you, you must assume there is another until you have proven otherwise.

3. Circumstance


Predator and Prey Strategies

All animals, including man, are faced with the problem of predation. When a predator enters an environment occupied by prey an interaction begins in which the predator and the prey are faced with decisions on how to proceed. Each participant has a narrow range of strategies and behaviors in which to accomplish their respective goals.

For the predator the strategy generally is to construct a condition where he can approach the prey to within a critical distance where he can successfully execute his strike.

For the prey the strategy is to fight, flee or freeze.

The narrow range of these strategies sets conditions where the behaviors of the respective parties are recognizable to the other as they are being executed.

VCA Predation Strategies

Critical distance, the distance at which a predator can successfully launch an attack, may vary according to their chosen implement of attack, but most frequently is measured in feet.

There are exceptions such as those seen in the Beltway Snipers who practiced their craft in the DC area in the fall of 2002 and Charles Whitman who used the tower of a Texas university in 1966, but most commonly VCA choose to work at nearly touching distance.

To reach critical distance the VCA commonly looks for physical environments where he can take advantage of conditions that will restrict the successful flight of his prey.
Constricted areas such as rooms, areas between parked vehicles, the interiors of vehicles and such allow the VCA to acquire critical distance. VCA also use the behavior of their prey to enhance their ability to reach critical distance by observing which, in the number of possible targets, are distracted by attention to common personal duties and activities that make up the daily life. On occasion, VCA use artifice and device, and sometimes distraction, (Ted Bundy) to aid in reaching critical distance. Most commonly the VCA uses a direct, purposeful and quickened pace to close the final span of space to critical distance.

While less common, it is certainly not uncommon for the VCA to loiter about in a location that will bring the prey into critical distance, even if that location is an open area such as a street. When the prey places themselves into critical distance, the VCA executes his strike.

VCA working in teams will most often operate in concert to maneuver and restrict the flight options of their prey.

The common feature of VCA activity is to create circumstances where critical distance necessary for their strike is reached. The recognition of this feature should serve as an alarm that activates in the Practitioner a pre-loaded response designed to first confirm the actual nature of the threat and to implement the solution available.

Response Strategies

Across the animal world, including man, response strategies to predation is the same. Fight, flight or freeze is seen universally.

Fight

Predation is distinguishable from fighting. Fights have certain rules that are morality based. Whether common bar room brawls, the Rules of War, or the Code Duello, there are features that define a fight. Among those features is a public announcement of grievance, postured challenge, an opportunity to resolve the challenge short of actual engagement, an understanding of what manner of blows are and are not acceptable within the context of the actual engagement, a cessation of blows upon the injured when they are no longer capable of effective response, the obligation to provide for or not interfere with assistance to the injured party and the recognition of and the avoidance of injury to non-combatants to the engagement. Violation of these features is considered unfair and immoral.

Predation is, therefore, an immoral act. The immoral nature of the act serves as a root for the criminalization of violent predation. Even in the face of VCA predation the Practitioner who violates these moral rules places himself in jeopardy of criminal sanctions. Hence the trained verbal challenge offered to a VCA, Drop the gun!, serves a public notice, the opportunity for the VCA to cease his actions and even escape, the requirement to avoid the delivery of no more than reasonably necessary blows and the provision of assistance to the injured VCA when the threat is reduced to an acceptable level are all moral requirements of the fight response to the offerings of VCA predation. The fight response of a Practitioner will be examined by authorities to determine compliance with these rules. Specific circumstance may obviate the ability to comply with some of them, but an acceptable explanation will still be necessary to avoid assignment to a reciprocal act of immorality.

A fight can be defined as an engagement with a hostile in which every decision you make is worth your life, or in some cases, the life of another. Fight response has various forms. The one most commonly considered is a counter-attack designed to over-power the attacker. There are circumstances where that may not be possible or is less effective than other forms of assertive response. At VT some responded by tarrying Cho by obstructing his access to critical distance on others. The response of the Professor who blocked Chos access to a classroom by using his own body is no less a form of fighting, given the option circumstance, than directly engaging him with force designed to over-power him. The fight response does not guarantee survival and in some instances that chosen response can include the decision to die purposefully.

Flight

Flight to avoid an act of VCA predation is the preferred response strategy. Flight response is most effective when it is exercised before the VCA is able to reach critical distance. The concept of awareness seeks to address this issue. Flight response is complicated by circumstance such as physical obstructions, duty sworn obligations and non-duty sworn obligations to others for whom the Practitioner has a legal or moral obligation and who may not, because of personal condition or circumstance, be able to apply that response. Flight response, if possible, is the legal obligation imposed by most jurisdictions.

Circumstance may limit the available response to VCA predation to the flight option even if the VCA has reached critical distance.

Freeze

Freeze response, often derided as grass-eater response, is a response that is implemented when the predator has reached critical distance and initiates his attack with overwhelming force of violence. There is evidence that it is well known throughout the animal world. There is reason, therefore, to view it as a universal strategy, though certainly the least attractive one, to predatory attacks. The freeze response would suggest a strategy of hoping the predator is distracted from his actions sufficiently to overlook the user of this strategy. Cho, the VT killer, seems to have missed some of his prey in this fashion. He was apparently further distracted from his actions by the response of the police which lead to his self termination. The end result was that some of those who opted for the freeze strategy survived.

Predation Strategies and Response

Predation strategies used by VCA and the response strategies used by their targets seem to be universal in the animal world. It is possible these strategies are the product of other than learned behavior, though personality may impel individuals more towards one form of response than another.

Predation is an immoral act that is devoid of rules. Fighting is a moral act that is rule driven. Particularly as it applies to fight response, techniques designed to make that response more effective can be learned and practiced. Of greater importance is the learning and practice of moral decision making. The inculcation of moral behavior allows the Practitioner to instantly make decisions in the midst of real-time evolving circumstance.

The Practitioner will never know the nature and circumstance of the test imposed upon him by a VCA. None of the techniques provided to him in training may fit the test he will face. Only his moral make-up will allow him to respond with the circumstance specific improvised technique.

Practitioners must learn to recognize behaviors designed by VCA to place them inside critical distance. The recognition of those behaviors must activate an alarm that causes the Practitioner to focus on the source or sources of that behavior until the suspicion is confirmed. At the same time the self-generated alarm is activated a set of pre-loaded actions must begin to run. As with the alarm system in a house, it’s primary function is to provide adequate time to initiate a response.

Practitioners must also recognize the narrow range of specific response strategies to VCA predation. Selection among these responses will be tied to the level of penetration the VCA has established into critical distance and the imposition of circumstance peculiar to the specific test posed.

Managing Non-Specific Encounters

Non-Specific Encounters are the most common form of contact Practitioners have with VCA.

Commonly referred to as street encounters, they regularly occur in areas away from the Practitioners residence.

VCA will commonly use a series of behaviors and signals that telegraph their intentions. These behaviors and signals can be readily perceived, interpreted and reflected to the VCA.

Rude v. Ruse

The Non-Specific Encounter will begin as either a Rude or Ruse contact.

Rude

The approach will be direct and confrontational. Demands for compliance will be made. Breathtaking effrontery will be employed.
- Hey man! I got to get paid!
- Yo! Youre holding my wallet!

Common street jargon that is unfamiliar to the ordinary person will slow the reaction of the Practitioner as he tries to interpret the meaning of the uttered words.

The purpose is to be able to close the distance and control the movement of the Practitioner.

Ruse

The Ruse approach will be more polite. It will make a plea for some kind of assistance. This approach relies on the common trait of all polite people to willingly attempt to comply with a polite request for help.

Effrontery will again be employed. Polite rejection of the request will be ignored and continued and repeated requests will be made.
- Can you please help me find...
- I want to share the Word with you! Let me read to you from the Book of Fallopians?

The purpose is again to slow the reaction of the Practitioner and to be able to close the distance and channel the movement of the target.

CHANNELING

Channeling is an attempt by the VCA to control the movements of the target.

Ideally, the control of movement will be to stop the target and stake him in place.

Alternatively, the action is designed to get the target to place himself in a confined area where he can not escape.

BLUFF

The Bluff is part of the instrumental motive of VCA.

The Bluffer has no interest in wagering his life to exercise his claim of right to the mine you possess. That means he is not willing to fight. He is willing to kill.

An alternative to the Bluff is the Ruthless Bluff. It uses the immediate employment of the available weapons system of the VCA. In short, he shoots you and takes the wallet out of your pocket as you lay on the ground.

ATTACK INDICATORS

There are a series of (4) attack indicators that operate in conjunction with the action to control the Practitioners movements.

They are commonly seen in the moments before the attack.

They may occur in any sequence and any one or more of them may be repeated multiple times before the actual attack.

Grooming

Grooming is usually touching or stroking the head or face.

Assessment glances.

Assessment glances are for the VCA to make a final check of conditions before the initiation of the attack. They are typically hard glances. They may be to see that no one not associated with him has moved into the area. They may be to assure that cohorts are in position. They may be targeting glances to view the specific area of attack on the targets person he intends to strike.

Body Load

Just before the attack the VCA will prepare his body for the attack. He will take a set. He will typically shift his weight for a strike. He will expand his body and raise his shoulders and put his nose over his toes. He will usually square his body to the target.

False Starts

VCA rarely have their weapons secured in a weapons transport system. Their mode of carry is insecure. They will typically use their hands to secure their weapon especially as they move about prior to the attack.

They will also typically make false start movements towards their weapon before they actually make their presentation.

STRATEGY

An approach by an Instrumentally Motivated VCA must be met with a strategy that allows for him to understand that you are aware of what he is and what his intentions are.

Because he is not usually willing to wager his life in order to get your wallet, he must understand that you interpret his actions as hostile and are prepared to respond.

This conveyance of information to him is designed to cause a restraining judgment to be formed in him. At the same time it is designed to prepare you for a response if he is not restrained.

The VCA is aware of the process he uses is his preparation for attack. The best method of interactive interpretation for conveying your alarm and belief that he has hostile intent is to mirror his actions to him.

His preferred method of gaining compliance is the bluff. That does not mean he is not about to use violence on the Practitioner. It means he is not likely to be willing to fight. If he is inclined to be dissuaded in his hostile act, it will be because he understands the bluff is being rejected.

The ruthless bluff will likely appear as the production of the weapons system available to the VCA as he is making his approach. The (4) attack indicators will still be used though they will be used in an aggressive approach.

In such instances the Practitioner must be prepared to ruthlessly default to immediate action without mirroring.

VCA will develop an approach to the Defender that will place the two of them within arms reach of one another.

The Defenders response should seek to (1) disrupt the flow of the Aggressors attack, (2) lengthen the time required for the Aggressor to complete his deployment of a weapon, (3) allow the Defender to get off the line of force developed by the Aggressor and any cohorts, (4) expand the time the Defender has to deploy his own weapons system and (5) respond in a fashion not predicted by the Aggressor.

DISRUPT THE FLOW OF THE AGGRESSORS ATTACK

Because the Aggressor will be the initiator in an attack, the Defender must have a strategy that will “capture the mind� of the Aggressor and redirect his attack actions.

Upon recognizing he is under attack, the Defender should respond by taking an action designed to cause the Aggressor to re-orient his body, thus disrupting the flow of his attack.

As the head goes, the body will follow. A strike to the head causes an involuntary movement of the body from its assumed attitude to another. This re-orientation of the body will occur even if the strike is ineffectual or misses completely.

LENGTHEN THE TIME REQUIRED FOR THE AGGRESSOR TO COMPLETE THE DEPLOYMENT OF HIS WEAPON.

A strike to the eyes or head of the Aggressor will cause him to re-orient his body and lengthen the time he needs to deploy his weapon.

An alternative to a strike to the head is a solid shoulder contact by the Defender to the Aggressors upper body.

ALLOW THE DEFENDER TO GET OFF THE LINE OF FORCE

As the Defender accomplishes his strike, he steps aggressively forward and at a 45-degree angle to the Aggressor. This action moves the Defender to a location of the line of force established by the Aggressor and his cohorts.

EXPAND THE TIME THE DEFENDER HAS TO DEPLOY HIS OWN WEAPON

As the Defender is responding to an attack initiated by the Aggressor and is therefore behind in time, his response must allow for an expansion of time available for the deployment of his own weapon. The Defender deploys his weapon simultaneous with his strike and movement off the line of force.

Using the “immediate danger distance ready position the Defender engages the Aggressor with gunfire repeatedly, while continuing to step off the respectively established line of force until the problem is resolved, observing the requirements of the law and the Gunsite 4 Rules.

RESPOND IN A FASHION NOT ANTICIPATED BY THE AGGRESSOR

Aggressors, like all people engaged in a confrontation activity, have a mental image of their actions and the anticipated response of the target. They have visualized their behavior and that of the target in mental rehearsal for the confrontation. The Defender must have a strategy in place and loaded that is outside the assumptions made by the aggressor. Execution of the unanticipated response by the Defender to the planned actions of the Aggressor will cause a momentary confusion and drag in execution of the Aggressors plan.


RECOGNIZING THE IMMEDIACY OF ATTACK

When a non-intimate places themselves within the immediate danger distance zone, a Practitioner should be alert for the possibility of a pending attack.

Using a generalized focus, the Defender observes the hand actions of the Aggressor. Upon determining that the Aggressor is engaged in weapons deployment, the Defender executes his pre-loaded response.

Because few VCA use holster based carrying systems, the manner of presentation will differ from those used when a holster is used. VCA will usually carry weapons concealed among their clothing. Often the weapon is thrust into the belt line of the pants or a pocket.

VCA will attempt to get within immediate danger distance to execute their attack. They will use various devices to accomplish the closing of distance. Some strategies will involve the use of terrain and architecture; some will involve an immediate approach. While the Practitioner should try to avoid being in such proximity to any non-intimate, he must also have a system in place to deal with the eventuality that he is caught is such a situation.

–––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––– –––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––– ––––––––––––––––––––-
Inside the Criminal Mind
By: Stanton Samenow, Ph.D.

Dr. Samenow began work in 1968 as a clinical psychologist, believing along with much of his peers that criminals were victims of their circumstances and station in life. In 1970 he took a position at Washington D.C.s Saint Elizabeth Hospital under Dr. Samuel Yochelson. It was there that his view of the criminal mind was challenged, and those observations became the subject of this book.

Far from a stodgy, academic book, Inside the Criminal Mind talks to the average reader, in terms he understands, of a worldview he can barely grasp. The motivations, mindset, and moral code of the criminal are revealed to us. Learning the thought processes of the criminal element in our society can help guide us when one interjects himself into our life.

The work of Yochelson and Samenow challenged the prevalent notions, rejected them, and offered their own interpretations. Chiefly: Criminals choose to commit crimes. They also experienced success working with criminals to change their lives by confronting the VCA directly with his choices. They did not allow the criminals they rehabilitated to obfuscate, dismiss, or deflect their personal responsibility for their choices.

The relevant chapters in this book begin by detailing for us the development of the criminal from childhood. As early as 4 years of age, similar patterns of behavior were commonly identified throughout the patient studies they conducted. From childhood to adolescence, remarkably consistent social interactions and thought processes were identified:
§ Lying was used, not to conceal embarrassment, but as a weapon.
§ They believed themselves smarter, more cunning, and better than their peers who followed the system.
§ They first learned to manipulate those who trusted them and loved them.
§ Later all people, including the other delinquents they formed friendships with, were seen as pawns. They also manipulated others within their own social structure as an exercise in control.
§ They learned around the age of 10 how to be charming, as overt deviousness served to only get them caught, or bring unwanted attention.
§ They chose to associate themselves with older children and teenagers seen as daring, risk-takers rather than those their own age.
§ Some are attracted to competition, determined to outshine everyone else. They take any loss or failure as a self-image crisis. They are impossibly arrogant winners or else revenge seeking losers.
§ As a youth, he must convey an image of himself to others as unflappable and invincible.

Again, these behaviors are all learned at a young age, and perfected by the time his peers are in their final years of high school.

Dr. Samenow suggests the criminal is often fascinated by the Police. Even at a young age they respect the Officer, and are awed by his power and influence over others. This often continues into adulthood. The contempt for the Officer and the law only goes so far as when they pose an immediate threat to him. They understand societys rules, and even expect obedience to them of society. A criminal who makes his living mugging old ladies sees it as just something I do to get by in life. At the same time, he would viciously attack a mugger who stole his mothers purse. Societys laws must be obeyed by all but him.

Criminals refuse to recognize themselves as bad men. They may be thieves, rapists, or murderers, but they refuse to define themselves by their acts. He simply decides that, at any particular time, he can make exceptions for himself to commit criminal acts because it suits him at that time. The rest of his life he sees himself as basically a good person, and compartmentalizes his criminal acts.

“Although the criminal may not accept what others consider moral standards, he claims to have his own set of morals. Other people are liars, perverts, scoundrels, and criminals, not he . . . even in prison an inmate is not likely to see himself as a real criminal. It is the other inmates whom he views as the real ones. He looks down on them as depraved because they do things that he would not. Specific crimes are wrong and thus off limits for him simply because he personally finds them offensive.

The criminal will even blame his victims. Embezzlers will blame company officers for being foolish with their money. Thieves and muggers will suggest their victims should have known better to walk through my neighborhood. Rapists will blame a woman for wearing an outfit so salacious, even suggesting she begged for me to take her. Murderers will proclaim, He should have known better than to do such and such. What the heck did he think I was going to do when he did that? Ignore it?

So, what does this book have to offer us as Practitioners? Why should we concern ourselves with becoming acquainted with the thought processes of The Criminal Mind? Because the knowledge of how criminals operate will help us to avoid becoming a victim. An early recognition of their behavior might help us deescalate a violent interaction when we see it unfolding.

The way criminals think are entirely foreign to the life experiences of most decent men. We have generally no experience setting up a con; or putting together a street robbery; or any of the other many types of violence we can find ourselves presented.
Thanks Anianna!
Image

12_Gauge_Chimp wrote:I say when Wee Drop visits the US, we make her ride a goat. You know, like those little monkey cowboys they have at some rodeos. :lol:
nimdabew
* * * * *
 
Posts: 9242
Joined: Fri Aug 29, 2008 8:27 am
Location: Seattle, WA

Re: Mindset while carrying

Postby bigmattdaddywack » Mon Feb 06, 2012 3:45 pm

Well I read about how they lie to the guys mother. Really honorable.

ETA
Read some more, I would do it too. :D
User avatar
bigmattdaddywack
ZS Member
ZS Member
 
Posts: 1606
Joined: Sat Oct 24, 2009 4:00 pm
Location: St. Louis, Missouri

Re: Mindset while carrying

Postby TheLastOne » Mon Feb 06, 2012 5:45 pm

^?

and

Good reads, thanks for posting
MF'N Team Leader: Cleveland Steamers 2012
Image
User avatar
TheLastOne
ZS Member
ZS Member
 
Posts: 2175
Joined: Tue Jul 27, 2010 5:06 pm
Location: CO

Re: Mindset while carrying

Postby TDW586 » Mon Feb 06, 2012 7:33 pm

bigmattdaddywack wrote:Well I read about how they lie to the guys mother. Really honorable.

ETA
Read some more, I would do it too. :D



I cannot :roll: hard enough.

Good post, OP, thanks.
Image
User avatar
TDW586
* * * * *
 
Posts: 8660
Joined: Wed Mar 23, 2005 8:03 pm
Location: Here, unless I'm not, in which case, somewhere else

Re: Mindset while carrying

Postby quazi » Mon Feb 06, 2012 10:13 pm

Maybe I'm misunderstanding the author quoted in the first post, but it seems like he is advocating that people should not be hesitant to unconceal/draw their firearms at a perceived threat, and at the same time people should shoot immediately upon seeing the other person's weapon. It seems to me that if everyone were to follow that advice small misjudgements could go bad very quickly.

I'm probably just not reading the author's words as he intended them to be read.
Image
quazi
* * * * *
 
Posts: 3128
Joined: Tue Aug 23, 2005 5:51 am
Location: AK

Re: Mindset while carrying

Postby TDW586 » Mon Feb 06, 2012 10:34 pm

quazi wrote:Maybe I'm misunderstanding the author quoted in the first post, but it seems like he is advocating that people should not be hesitant to unconceal/draw their firearms at a perceived threat, and at the same time people should shoot immediately upon seeing the other person's weapon. It seems to me that if everyone were to follow that advice small misjudgements could go bad very quickly.

I'm probably just not reading the author's words as he intended them to be read.



I think he's saying that you have to be able to read the situation. Guy running through a parking lot with a gun, no prior interaction with him, not presenting a threat to you beyond holding the gun, is a no shoot without aggressive action. Guys wandering up to you on a dark street, flanking you, beginning an "interview" process with threatening or probing questions, inappropriate requests, and then you see a gun, shoot.

As far as drawing on a perceived threat, I have to say I agree with him. A lot of legal myths have been perpetuated by the internet concealed carry guys. If you feel like someone is legitimately a threat, putting a hand on your concealed carry and drawing it if they approach is not at all likely to get you charged with a crime. The key is being able to articulate why you felt they were a threat, if LEOs become involved.
Image
User avatar
TDW586
* * * * *
 
Posts: 8660
Joined: Wed Mar 23, 2005 8:03 pm
Location: Here, unless I'm not, in which case, somewhere else

Re: Mindset while carrying

Postby flsgear » Tue Feb 07, 2012 12:49 pm

Thought I'd chime in here on something I thought I could *gasp* add value on.

specifically:

"ALLOW THE DEFENDER TO GET OFF THE LINE OF FORCE

As the Defender accomplishes his strike, he steps aggressively forward and at a 45-degree angle to the Aggressor. This action moves the Defender to a location of the line of force established by the Aggressor and his cohorts."


I'm a 12-13 year student of Filipino Arnis; I'm also an instructor under Duane Ranieri (master instructor under GM Ernesto Presas). The way this relates is that in Kombatan Escrima/Arnis the footwork is always in 45 degree angles unless moving straight forward or straight backwards. There is no side to side movement. There's several reasons for the 'triangular footwork' we do. That being that A) it's easy to learn B) it's highly effective C) it's goal is always to improve your position.

A simple drill you can do for this is to take two sticks on the ground, place them in a V facing you. Pretend this is the oncoming attack. Now step off angle forward at 45 degrees and shift to face the opponent. Now you are at a superior angle to them and are stepping PAST their strike (if you have a developed sense of timing this becomes really nasty). It affords a high level of advantage.

The following is a so-so video that sort of illustrates what I'm talking about. Not quite the same in that he doesn't shift to face the opponent, but meh. fast forward to 2:40 if you want to see what I'm talking about.
[YouTube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pqX2iHhHwlY&feature=related[/YouTube]

*grumbles about having the right video a few months ago and losing it*

Anyways, just thought I'd clarify. Good set of articles, peace.
Owner, Messina's Front Line Survival Gear - website at http://www.flsgear.com!
Blog: flsgear.wordpress.com (mostly inactive)
Twitter: twitter.com/mmessina_author (active, not biz related)
Facebook: http://on.fb.me/foPFgx (very active)
Also part-time sci-fi author - http://amzn.to/vYUbTw
User avatar
flsgear
* * *
 
Posts: 317
Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2010 12:59 am
Location: Harrisburg, PA

Re: Mindset while carrying

Postby TDW586 » Tue Feb 07, 2012 6:02 pm

Marc Denny goes over that footwork in the Die Less Often series, I think DLO 2: Integration of the gun, knife and empty hand. Good DVD series.
Image
User avatar
TDW586
* * * * *
 
Posts: 8660
Joined: Wed Mar 23, 2005 8:03 pm
Location: Here, unless I'm not, in which case, somewhere else

Re: Mindset while carrying

Postby TheLastOne » Tue Feb 07, 2012 8:13 pm

pretty common, I've been taught it in Krav, Muay Thai and boxing too. It puts you at spectacular advantage against an attacker a). who is a shitty fighter, b). moving too fast/off balance to recover c).even against good fighters if you are faster than them. It almost feels like cheating.
MF'N Team Leader: Cleveland Steamers 2012
Image
User avatar
TheLastOne
ZS Member
ZS Member
 
Posts: 2175
Joined: Tue Jul 27, 2010 5:06 pm
Location: CO

Re: Mindset while carrying

Postby SeerSavant » Tue Feb 14, 2012 2:10 am

Nice article... thanks for the read....
User avatar
SeerSavant
* * * * *
 
Posts: 3391
Joined: Fri Jul 30, 2010 8:18 pm
Location: Virginia Beach


Return to Training

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests