Moderator: ZS Global Moderators
Cymro wrote:Seriously, I'm not sure I'd fuck with Ad'lan if he had his bow with him. I just don't see that ending well.

Ad'lan wrote:Size isn't that important. Draw weight is. Do you know your draw weight, or your draw length?

Dlongmuir wrote:Unfortunately I don't know my draw weight or length.

Jeriah wrote:I think we're all pretty much just bullshitting here, which is what the Internet is for. Besides porn.
Silent Kube wrote:Or you could take a yardstick and act like you're drawing it back like an arrow and have someone read you the measurement. May not be perfectly accurate but it'll give you a decent idea.
Cymro wrote:Seriously, I'm not sure I'd fuck with Ad'lan if he had his bow with him. I just don't see that ending well.

DREAMSCAPE wrote:Anybody have any suggestions on purchasing a new bow to replace the 20 year old Darton Im still shooting? Im a fingers shooter and it seems like all the new bows I've seen are short & set up for release shooters and they tend to put my fingers in a bind
I googled the models you listed and liked some of them just not the price tags! but using the criteria you listed above for a good fingers shooting bow i found a few other models in my price range that i also liked . thanks for the information it helped!northernxposure wrote:DREAMSCAPE wrote:Anybody have any suggestions on purchasing a new bow to replace the 20 year old Darton Im still shooting? Im a fingers shooter and it seems like all the new bows I've seen are short & set up for release shooters and they tend to put my fingers in a bind
There's a few on the market, but you'll already be more expensive than the usual "hunter" models as all the long ATA bows are usually set up for target shooting.
Not knowing which Darton you have, I'll assume it's one of the early round cam designs with about 60% letoff. If you're shooting fingers with wheels, try and keep the ATA (axle to axle) length above 39" with a large brace height (>7"). Current models I'd look at would be the Hoyt Vantage LTD and the Mathews Apex 8, or the Conquest 4.
Personally I owned the Conquest 4 for a bit and had no issues at all shooting it with fingers. I downsized to a Mathews Ovation, but after owning that one for a bit, I'll probably end up switching it out for either the C4 or the A7 again, just personal preference.
NXP
shulatt wrote:Dlongmuir wrote:Unfortunately I don't know my draw weight or length.
One basic formula I've seen for figuring draw length is to measure your wing-span (middle finger to middle finger with arms outstretched parallel to the ground) in inches, subtract 15 inches and divide the remainder by 2. Wing-span and height are usually fairly close in most people, so that can also give you a ball park estimate.
shulatt


northernxposure wrote:Nice Matrix. If you're going to drop over a grand (purchased new) on a bow, though, I'm sure someone measured you!
It's also feasible that you're close; figuring 0.5" for the loop, Hoyt's run slightly long unless you under rotate the cam, you're probably right on the money. 6'8" wingspan - freaks I tell you, yeti freaks!
NXP

shulatt wrote:Dlongmuir wrote:Unfortunately I don't know my draw weight or length.
One basic formula I've seen for figuring draw length is to measure your wing-span (middle finger to middle finger with arms outstretched parallel to the ground) in inches, subtract 15 inches and divide the remainder by 2. Wing-span and height are usually fairly close in most people, so that can also give you a ball park estimate.
shulatt
Kyle Ryder wrote:shulatt wrote:Dlongmuir wrote:Unfortunately I don't know my draw weight or length.
One basic formula I've seen for figuring draw length is to measure your wing-span (middle finger to middle finger with arms outstretched parallel to the ground) in inches, subtract 15 inches and divide the remainder by 2. Wing-span and height are usually fairly close in most people, so that can also give you a ball park estimate.
shulatt
Thanks for that info.
Just did a calculation based on that formula and it came out at 28 inches.
Just what my longbow is 'set' at according to the bowyer I got it from

northernxposure wrote:I don't know what is going on with the "squat/shoot" thing, but either you're way over bowed or you've got no clue on stance and shot alignment. Either way, I can't see any of that ending well.
Time for some lessons. And a few less pounds.
NXP
Kyle Ryder wrote:northernxposure wrote:I don't know what is going on with the "squat/shoot" thing, but either you're way over bowed or you've got no clue on stance and shot alignment. Either way, I can't see any of that ending well.
Time for some lessons. And a few less pounds.
NXP
Everyone has his own style, with longbows its different to the compound wheel bows mate
Cymro wrote:Seriously, I'm not sure I'd fuck with Ad'lan if he had his bow with him. I just don't see that ending well.

Ad'lan wrote:Kyle Ryder wrote:northernxposure wrote:I don't know what is going on with the "squat/shoot" thing, but either you're way over bowed or you've got no clue on stance and shot alignment. Either way, I can't see any of that ending well.
Time for some lessons. And a few less pounds.
NXP
Everyone has his own style, with longbows its different to the compound wheel bows mate
The Squat/Shoot is called drawing in the bow, and though I wouldn't really call 55lb over bowed, or needing quite the stance, it is traditional when shooting warbows. It's a very nice Full compass bow though.
northernxposure wrote:What ever it is, it's completely different from a proper target stance and I can't see any benefit at all from it. A lot of wasted energy, and while I don't think 55# is too much ( I shoot a 57# recurve myself for hunting), what I'm seeing in the video posted looks like a classic case of beginner being over bowed. You could argue that it's something like the Asbel technique, but even that's not correct for what's on the video. You should be able to draw smoothly, while maintaining focus on the target.
Let me give you an example -
I can pull my recurve smoothly, slowly and hold it at full draw for a full 20 seconds from a seated position. Shooting from a seated position is a great indicator, you should not need to "sky" the bow (eg, draw down from above) to pull it back, nor should you need to yank or snap shoot. If you can smoothly pull it back while seated, you're at the right weight. Even more of a challenge, push and pull at the same time (useful if shooting from an enclosed area like blind).
I think it's wonderful you're having fun and have an interest in shooting archery. I also think you'd be better served getting some instruction and not build a multitude of bad habits that will plague you, and possibly rob you of potential accuracy and ability you haven't yet experienced.
NXP (and I still don't have a clue why you people from England think a longbow's sole purpose is to lob arrows willy-nilly across a field...)
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests