Moderators: Dave_M, ZS Global Moderators
docdredd wrote:those pandas need to harden the fuck up


BattleVersion wrote:For my Family?...
Burn down the world, sure... But, I'm also willing to carry it on my shoulders.




jamoni wrote:Zombie Squad, the things you have experience with scare me.

oldsoldier wrote:Ok, I got this from a kid, in HS, when I was young-mind you, this was mid 80's, and he was a grade or 2 above me, tops.
His story was that he was in Vietnam (this was when Vietnam became the "cool" war to have been in, all the movies had something about them, etc.). Now, he was born in 68-so, we ALL knew he was a bullshitter. He was just one of those kids. But, I specifically recall a "story" he told, where he said he killed a bunch of people, using a Sten gun-and, that a Sten gun was unique in the firearms world, in that it doesnt shoot bullets, the gun actually chews up the magazine & fires tiny pieces of it. Now, I didnt know much, or ANYTHING, about firearms, when I was young, but I SPECIFICALLY remember that story, all these years later. And, to this day, it sticks with me.
majorhavoc wrote:HKTD, you’re even more right on than you might know. I don't practice law, but I did go to law school.
I remember in torts class we studied a group of civil law cases that all revolved around the idea of "spring guns". In the field of jurisprudence, a spring gun isn't what you might expect. It's any firearm rigged to fire automatically without any human intervention after setting it up.
The court decisions have been very clear about this whole concept: it's a wildly irresponsible idea and is dealt with very severely. You think you've got a legal fight on your hands shooting an intruder in self defense? Chafe at the idea of having to prove reasonable fear of imminent harm to person or property? Think its common sense that the "no reasonable retreat" doctrine shouldn't apply inside one's own home?
Well good f-ing lucking getting anywhere legally defending yourself if someone gets hurt by a gun you've rigged to fire indiscriminately once it's "sprung". Whether by a spring catch or an infrared sensor, it falls under the same legal doctrine and the court decisions are very clear on this (as they should be, IMHO). That moron's idea of actually trying to build one of these things is stupid in ways that almost defy description.
The only silver lining to this is that if the human race is lucky, this idiot will quickly qualify for a Darwin Award while testing it.
www.dreamindemon.comgoofygurl wrote:Dogan – In charge of all things fucked up
Vicarious_Lee wrote:If Nutnfacny were an 8-ounce chicken fried steak, he'd come with 72 ounces of batter around it that you have to slash through to get to it.

Bunsen wrote:majorhavoc wrote:HKTD, you’re even more right on than you might know. I don't practice law, but I did go to law school.
I remember in torts class we studied a group of civil law cases that all revolved around the idea of "spring guns". In the field of jurisprudence, a spring gun isn't what you might expect. It's any firearm rigged to fire automatically without any human intervention after setting it up.
The court decisions have been very clear about this whole concept: it's a wildly irresponsible idea and is dealt with very severely. You think you've got a legal fight on your hands shooting an intruder in self defense? Chafe at the idea of having to prove reasonable fear of imminent harm to person or property? Think its common sense that the "no reasonable retreat" doctrine shouldn't apply inside one's own home?
Well good f-ing lucking getting anywhere legally defending yourself if someone gets hurt by a gun you've rigged to fire indiscriminately once it's "sprung". Whether by a spring catch or an infrared sensor, it falls under the same legal doctrine and the court decisions are very clear on this (as they should be, IMHO). That moron's idea of actually trying to build one of these things is stupid in ways that almost defy description.
The only silver lining to this is that if the human race is lucky, this idiot will quickly qualify for a Darwin Award while testing it.
Or, more likely, he'll discover that designing and building automated electromechanical systems is difficult even when you're not a flaming moron, and give up. Stupidity does sometimes self-limit before it hits the Darwin threshold.
KnifeStyle wrote:Bullets can be sharpened.-Guy at an anime convention.

TerryGecko wrote:"All you need is a file to make an AK47 full auto. It's so easy."
www.dreamindemon.comgoofygurl wrote:Dogan – In charge of all things fucked up
HKTackDriver wrote:Sometimes the stupidity of people around firearms is astounding. I mean - MONUMENTALLY braindead astounding. Yesterday I was at my local fun shop and this guy walks in and starts talking about some show he saw on tv and how he's thinking about starting some project using infrared cameras "like in Aliens" to be automated to fire at animals, so when you're hunting, it'll help hunters. When I politely pointed out that an automated system wouldn't be able to tell a 4 legged from 2 legged animal apart, his response was, "why would it matter? Then I can sell it to the military." Really guy? Right after that, pretty much everyone started telling him to leave the R&D to the big boys and that his idea was flawed on many levels. Basically, we shunned him out of the store. After he left, we were all left with the impression that he didn't care whether it killed people or animals, just as long as it worked, it would be a success.
Anyway, I had to share. What are some of the dumb things you've heard people say regarding firearms?


LBB wrote:oldsoldier wrote:Ok, I got this from a kid, in HS, when I was young-mind you, this was mid 80's, and he was a grade or 2 above me, tops.
His story was that he was in Vietnam (this was when Vietnam became the "cool" war to have been in, all the movies had something about them, etc.). Now, he was born in 68-so, we ALL knew he was a bullshitter. He was just one of those kids. But, I specifically recall a "story" he told, where he said he killed a bunch of people, using a Sten gun-and, that a Sten gun was unique in the firearms world, in that it doesnt shoot bullets, the gun actually chews up the magazine & fires tiny pieces of it. Now, I didnt know much, or ANYTHING, about firearms, when I was young, but I SPECIFICALLY remember that story, all these years later. And, to this day, it sticks with me.
I read this SciFi book where he got it from.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sten_Adven ... ok_1:_Sten
I think in this book, they have a weapon that shots plastic darts that are made from the magazine.
And if I am wrong, than it's from BattleTech
jt526 wrote:HKTackDriver wrote:Sometimes the stupidity of people around firearms is astounding. I mean - MONUMENTALLY braindead astounding. Yesterday I was at my local fun shop and this guy walks in and starts talking about some show he saw on tv and how he's thinking about starting some project using infrared cameras "like in Aliens" to be automated to fire at animals, so when you're hunting, it'll help hunters. When I politely pointed out that an automated system wouldn't be able to tell a 4 legged from 2 legged animal apart, his response was, "why would it matter? Then I can sell it to the military." Really guy? Right after that, pretty much everyone started telling him to leave the R&D to the big boys and that his idea was flawed on many levels. Basically, we shunned him out of the store. After he left, we were all left with the impression that he didn't care whether it killed people or animals, just as long as it worked, it would be a success.
Anyway, I had to share. What are some of the dumb things you've heard people say regarding firearms?
Tell him FN has that in the works. The FN dFendr.
http://www.fnherstal.com/index.php?id=658

omega_man wrote:
my favorite was: "Motor T and supply companies kill more (enemy) than infantry"
Vicarious_Lee wrote:If Nutnfacny were an 8-ounce chicken fried steak, he'd come with 72 ounces of batter around it that you have to slash through to get to it.

Return to General Firearms Discussion
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests