Moderator: ZS Global Moderators

Hoppy wrote:from my understanding the CUCV program failed to live up to even its ancillary duties hopes. they simply couldn't take the beatings. il account this to typical government employee driving as seen in cop cars and DPW trucks, but that just means surplus is surplus, buyer beware.
BigBossMan wrote:Hoppy wrote:from my understanding the CUCV program failed to live up to even its ancillary duties hopes. they simply couldn't take the beatings. il account this to typical government employee driving as seen in cop cars and DPW trucks, but that just means surplus is surplus, buyer beware.
The 6.2 diesel is a solid engine. The biggest issues with the CUCVs are electrical gremlins, the shitty Wellman glowplugs and rust. You will have to put some work into it, but in return you will get a solid, no frills vehicle
Hoppy wrote:BigBossMan wrote:Hoppy wrote:from my understanding the CUCV program failed to live up to even its ancillary duties hopes. they simply couldn't take the beatings. il account this to typical government employee driving as seen in cop cars and DPW trucks, but that just means surplus is surplus, buyer beware.
The 6.2 diesel is a solid engine. The biggest issues with the CUCVs are electrical gremlins, the shitty Wellman glowplugs and rust. You will have to put some work into it, but in return you will get a solid, no frills vehicle
not doubting the vehicles abilities from new. just a warning that surplus is surplus and should be individually evaluated. much like firearms
some are new in wrap, some have tank treads in the stock. i know the local NG CUCVs were good condition. but they saw little use compared to say an active duty truck at a major base.


Hoppy wrote:...surplus is surplus and should be individually evaluated. much like firearms
HKTackDriver wrote:And that's basically what I'm looking to get out of it. If I can do some wheeling and pull a military trailer with a load of mulch or whatnot, then great. Its not a DD, it's more of a toy. I could probably get a civilian model, but it would not have the "cool" factor. ANd yeah, sometimes the cool factor is worth it!
phil_in_cs wrote:I used to think it was 'any day now', but after 30+ years I've gotten tired of holding my breath.




greggk wrote:ummm ok... what does that have to do with the topic of the OP and wanting to purchase a CUCV? I could post up a picture of a Liger but it does nothing for the topic.
OP wrote:Thanks for the advice guys. But as far as the models go, is there anything out there that has what I'm looking for? I only listed the M1008,1009, 1025 as a guideline, but if you know of something else with that "it" factor, please let me know.
Regulator wrote:Questiongreggk wrote:ummm ok... what does that have to do with the topic of the OP and wanting to purchase a CUCV? I could post up a picture of a Liger but it does nothing for the topic.
AnswerOP wrote:Thanks for the advice guys. But as far as the models go, is there anything out there that has what I'm looking for? I only listed the M1008,1009, 1025 as a guideline, but if you know of something else with that "it" factor, please let me know.
Do Ligers have the "it factor"?
HKTackDriver wrote:Hey guys, I'm looking for someone to give me some info on the Chevy CUCV vehicles that are often seen in surplus auctions. I'm looking for a truck to play around in, but I'd like to keep something that is comfortable at highway speeds (at least 75mph so as to not get killed) and would be equally happy on a trail or towing a small trailer. Ideally, I'd retrofit an A/C down the road. Specifically, I've heard the M1008, 1009, 1025 are good vehicles, but there are different differentials, gearing, etc. What is generally the best for what I'm looking to do? If there is a non military vehicle (diesel) that would have a shorter wheelbase for off roading, i'm open to suggestions as well. Budget is around $4000 so the wife doesn't go apeshit.

JoergS wrote:Realistically, I think I can launch a nine pound chain saw at 50 fps from a shoulder mounted rubber powered bazooka...
squinty wrote:I reserve the right to yell "Dookyhole!" - or it's Hebrew equivalent if such a thing exists - whilst dispensing a barrage of palm strikes at my opponent.

jamoni wrote:BAck on topic, please, both of you.
On topic, we had several in my unit, and the biggest factor was that they couldn't go where the HMMWVs and 5 tons could go. We used the contact truck variants, don't remember the model #s. They had a lot of gear on them, a lot of weight, and would bog down in any muddy or sandy situation. The blazer ones fared better, but still couldn't keep up off road. Ruts and mud that wouldn't slow down the .MIL trucks would be show stoppers for the CUCVs.
In other words, they are about as capable as the average 4x4 truck, no more, no less.
If you find a decent deal on one, and are willing to keep up on the rust problem, it should be okay for what you want.
JoergS wrote:Realistically, I think I can launch a nine pound chain saw at 50 fps from a shoulder mounted rubber powered bazooka...
squinty wrote:I reserve the right to yell "Dookyhole!" - or it's Hebrew equivalent if such a thing exists - whilst dispensing a barrage of palm strikes at my opponent.


greggk wrote:just because it doesnt have the capabilities in stock form doesnt meab you cant upgrade. they have very very solid running gear that can take some abuse

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests