
Moderators: phil_in_cs, ZS Global Moderators

Valarius wrote:20% unemployment is only a surprise if you're not looking for it.Deschain wrote:Those numbers are so artificial, I don't think they mean a thing. Sure, you can shed jobs real easy, and put them on real easy. Shed the fat, add jobs at the very bottom. Of those created jobs, how many are at McDonald's or Jack in the Box? How many of those jobs put people in the market for a new house, or a car, or other major purchase? There's really no indication of the quality of these jobs, and that's what will determine how much money they'll pump back into the economy.
THAT is the truth. Here in Nevada, in all the towns I've seen, people who hold graduate degrees are fighting for cashier jobs at Wal-Mart. It used to be a ton of paperwork to get food stamps at the welfare office, surrounded by scuzzy people, and now we're conversing with teachers, managers and state employees in the line while getting processed as fast as possible. The House For Sale signs I've seen have been faded out by snow and sun from when they were planted last year. People are either driving their current car with scratched paint and missing bodywork or reparing and driving vintage 1970 sedans and vans, I assume because those cars use less gas and they're actually owned. Two weeks ago my mother and brother stood in the rain with 300 other people waiting for the food bank at the local church to open. Instead of going into their cars to wait, people opened umbrellas. No state income tax, no tax on food items, three years allowance to pay property taxes in full, other goodies. This is supposed to be a state that's very pro-business, and nobody's generating any jobs.
Henry Ford was smart enough to not only offer a minimum wage to his workers, but a high enough wage that his employees could buy the cars they made to keep him in business. Only when enough corporations remember that lesson will we see more permanent jobs, if they ever do.
Chef wrote:For instance, someone I know recently said, "I suppose I could hire one person to drive all over town in the dead of night and shatter people's windows. Then, I could hirefive more people to replace those windows each following day......thereby creating SIX NEW JOBS!!!!!!!"
It terrifies me not only how close that is to the truth of the matter, but how many people actually believe that sort of thing is good news, unlike the person who said it, who was being fatalistically sarcastic at the time.![]()
Thank you for the opportunity to mention the broken window fallacy.



"The global credit environment is worsening. Cost of capital is going up and availability is going down. There are large gaps between where the credit market prices risk and where the equity market is priced. Equity is lagging the deterioration in credit conditions. Moves in currency, equity and commodity markets are mirroring the moves in the credit market. Global growth, in a credit-constrained environment, will slow. Profits will be squeezed by the higher cost of capital...We advocate a zero weight toward equity, and that investors convert their equity positions to cash."
"“I don’t want to scare anyone but I am considering investing in barbed wire and guns, things are not looking good and rates are heading higher,” he said."
"The comments mirror those of bearish Bob Janjuah from RBS, who told CNBC on Friday that we are facing big stock market losses and told investors to get into gold before G20 governments attempt to throw another $15 trillion in quantitative easing in a bid to jump start the economy.

Old_Man wrote:Several Investing advisers and one investing house is basically screaming the markets are about to go under....depression style.
BMO Capital Markets is now advising their clients to go completely liquid. This isn't the only investing advisory group I have seen these types of comments from recently.


phil_in_cs wrote:"Going Liquid" can have some major tax implications too, as you have to pay your capital gains taxes. Also, it depends on your investing horizon. If you think this event will last a few years, and have a 20 year horizon, your choices are different than someone who will need the money within the next 4-5 years.

TheGunslinger wrote:Sorry, are you disagreeing with the fallacy or something? Who are you wanting to punch?


drunkensurvivor wrote:I assume you live in a part of Nevada that was hit very hard during the housing collapse. Maybe you should move to North Dakota:
"Job Service North Dakota (JSND) reported that labor statistics released today show North Dakota's April not seasonally adjusted unemployment rate was 3.8 percent. The rate is lower than prior month (4.9 percent), and 0.7 percentage points below the same period of prior year (4.5 percent)" http://jobsnd.com/
The economy minister, Gyorgy Matolcsy, said in an interview on CNBC that the government would stick to a budget deficit target of 3.8 percent of gross domestic product for 2010. He acknowledged that the government, led by the Fidesz party, had made a series of verbal gaffes in recent days but added that it was obvious that “Hungary is not Greece.”
Mr. Varga said the government was considering instituting a flat personal income tax of 15 to 20 percent. Other government officials said the possibility of a tax on banks was also being discussed. Mr. Orban was expected to present further measures before Parliament on Tuesday.
Financial Armageddon describes government actions thus:
Throughout the financial crisis, policymakers have focused on keeping things afloat until the storm passes. They've spent vast sums of taxpayer funds trying to jumpstart growth until the economy is back on track. They've encouraged people to keep the faith until businesses start hiring again.
Servicing existing debt is impossible because income levels are not high enough to do so. The economy cannot grow large enough fast enough to offset this problem. Debt will be liquidated by default/forgiveness.
Government has been unwilling to accept a downturn, adding more debt in hopes of generating a miracle that cannot arrive. The danger, as expressed by Financial Armageddon, is that the presumed "untils" do not happen:
But what happens if all those "untils" turn out to be wide of the mark? What if the carnage we've experienced so far is structural, not cyclical? If that's the case, then Americans are going to find that instead of experiencing better times ahead, they are going to be much worse off than they were -- or are.
Additional debt is of little value. Debt's marginal value, with respect to creating additional GDP, has gone negative. The government has fired all of its bullets. It has nothing left that will affect real output on any sustainable basis.
As the economy continues to devolve, deflationary forces grow stronger. The private sector continues to shed debt. The public sector attempts to offset this with greater deficit spending and more stimulus packages. The private sector is contracting faster than the government can expand.
How We Get Inflation
Our government is bankrupt many times over (see Spiraling to Bankruptcy), as are the democratic socialist states of Europe (see Welfare States - R. I. P.). For political reasons, none of these countries is either willing to cut back on its spending or accept a recession. Mish provided a description of both the U.S. and Europe (my emphasis):
For Europe, $1 trillion is not enough, nor would $10 trillion. There is no plan that can possibly work. But that will not stop politicians from trying. Politicians do not care about math or logic, or the fact that piling on more debt cannot possibly be the cure for a problem of too much debt with no possible way to pay it back.
We are witnessing the death of democratic socialism. No politician wants it to happen, but none can prevent it. We are at the point where the Ponzi concept of "extend and pretend" has been extended beyond social commitments and banking systems to entire economies. We are approaching what Ludwig von Mises described as "the crack-up boom":
There is no means of avoiding the final collapse of a boom brought about by credit [debt] expansion. The alternative is only whether the crisis should come sooner as the result of a voluntary abandonment of further credit [debt] expansion, or later as a final and total catastrophe of the currency system involved.
Political cowards around the world have chosen Mises' second outcome -- "a total catastrophe of the currency system involved."
None of the countries have the resources to continue to fund current programs. As their economies deteriorate, they will "print money" in order to continue meeting obligations and stimulating. At some point, the money supply will explode vis-à-vis the goods available.
We have seen many "impossibles" in the last couple of years. Be prepared for the next -- a hyperinflationary depression. It is not impossible, it is not an oxymoron, and it should surprise no thinking economist. It is nearly upon us.
Your lifestyle will depend on how prepared you are to meet this newest, biggest, and most horrific Black Swan. This beast will destroy economies, overthrow some governments, and alter the nature of the world.
WhoShotJR wrote:We have seen many "impossibles" in the last couple of years. Be prepared for the next -- a hyperinflationary depression. It is not impossible, it is not an oxymoron, and it should surprise no thinking economist. It is nearly upon us.
Your lifestyle will depend on how prepared you are to meet this newest, biggest, and most horrific Black Swan. This beast will destroy economies, overthrow some governments, and alter the nature of the world.


TheGunslinger wrote:
The austerity measures imposed by Greece and so forth would work in a country that had the discipline to do it. They are unpalatable and yes, would see a change in government in a lot of countries - but that's not the death of social democracy by a long stretch.
U.S debt to rise to $19.6 trillion by 2015
WASHINGTON
Tue Jun 8, 2010 6:19pm EDTWASHINGTON June 8 (Reuters) - The U.S. debt will top $13.6 trillion this year and climb to an estimated $19.6 trillion by 2015, according to a Treasury Department report to Congress.



Mister Dark wrote: Why do I mention him? He, like almost everyone of his generation (and the next as well) knew how to get by. If they couldnt make do with what they had, they simply made do with less. People these days just have no concept of that. While I am sure that there will be people who can survive, even thrive by the sweat of their brow, I am deeply concerned about the millions of people who have never had to work to earn their way. When the checks stop coming, what are they going to do? One thing my grandfather DIDNT have to deal with was rioting masses, with no idea how to prepare food, no way to provide for themselves, and in a rage to just TAKE whatever they can.
Thats what scares me about all this.
Mister Dark wrote:I have been giving a lot of thought to this scenario for a couple of years, and really it is my biggest TSHTF concern... edited for brevity...

WhoShotJR wrote:Mister Dark wrote: Why do I mention him? He, like almost everyone of his generation (and the next as well) knew how to get by. If they couldnt make do with what they had, they simply made do with less. People these days just have no concept of that. While I am sure that there will be people who can survive, even thrive by the sweat of their brow, I am deeply concerned about the millions of people who have never had to work to earn their way. When the checks stop coming, what are they going to do? One thing my grandfather DIDNT have to deal with was rioting masses, with no idea how to prepare food, no way to provide for themselves, and in a rage to just TAKE whatever they can.
Thats what scares me about all this.
That's what scares me most as well. The dollar could disappear tomorrow and I'd be fine for a while. The real hairy question is how people would react. We've all seen circumstances where small events cause big problems. What happens when we have big problems?
silentpoet wrote:My first two warning shots are aimed center of mass. If that don't warn them I fire warning shots at their head until they are warned enough that I am no longer in fear for my life.


Mister Dark wrote:Here's an odd question. The Treasury auctions have been returning lower and lower rates for several years, to the point now the 28 day note is almost but not quite actually losing money, if you factor in inflationary pressure during that timeperiod. What happens when we officially hit 0% ? Will anyone even want to buy them? What exactly would the treasury do if they had an auction completely fail?

It is also not something you are personally liable for, either - a lot of these clocks forget that the vast majority of revenue isn't personal income taxes, but company taxes of some description.

You can't take a country that's over-borrowed and make it more creditworthy by lending it more money," he said. "They're throwing Greece further and further and further in the hole by not addressing the problem directly and properly."
Return to Disasters in Current Events
Users browsing this forum: earl crow, psbot [Picsearch] and 2 guests