Moderator: ZS Global Moderators
crypto wrote:It's not that you were being "harsh" so much as a "douchebag".

williaty wrote:Yeah, as you found:
1) Propagation today over US/Canada was terrible
2) Both the North American QSO Party SSB contest and the International Lighthouse Special Event were today. Good day for contesting, terrible day for making contacts for the hell of it.
My comments about your setup:
1) FOR THE LOVE OF ALL THAT'S CHOCOLATE, COVER THE TERMINALS ON THE BATTERY! ........
2) Since you have Anderson PowerPoles (yay!) It's worth making up pigtail adapters to.....
3) Have you actually calculated the runtime with that battery and those...........
TacAir wrote:Cool
I have an 817/Pelican setup & run PSK-31 / CW while in backpack mode.
Thanks for sharing, I'd like to hear more about the cycle side of your wanderings as well.
BTW, the rig in the vid is a FT-817, not a SG-2020. I have both, the -2020 is used in the RV, the -817 in the backpack.
3) Have you actually calculated the runtime with that battery and those solar panels given the average insolation in your QTH/AO? I ask this because I did that calculation recently and was stunned by the answer. My radios draw 2A at 13.8VDC during receive (and a total of 35A during transmit if both are key-down). To have a 90% likelyhood of having enough power to leave the radios on to hear news, with no transmit time at all, it would take 900W of solar panel and 600Ah of battery bank in my location. This is due to the fact that the insolation in December is only 1.34 hours. I would imagine that you're probably worse off being even farther north. You may want to develop a second (or third, or tenth) box that you can add with contains nothing but more batteries and more solar.
coldshot wrote:3) Have you actually calculated the runtime with that battery and those solar panels given the average insolation in your QTH/AO? I ask this because I did that calculation recently and was stunned by the answer. My radios draw 2A at 13.8VDC during receive (and a total of 35A during transmit if both are key-down). To have a 90% likelyhood of having enough power to leave the radios on to hear news, with no transmit time at all, it would take 900W of solar panel and 600Ah of battery bank in my location. This is due to the fact that the insolation in December is only 1.34 hours. I would imagine that you're probably worse off being even farther north. You may want to develop a second (or third, or tenth) box that you can add with contains nothing but more batteries and more solar.
No kidding. I just calculated the Ah needed to run my 857D for 72 hrs. I was surprised to see a whopping 336 Ah! Too much weight and cost in batteries, to many solar panels, so I'm now in the market for a generator.

williaty wrote:It's actually surprisingly hard to find a "normal" radio that draws much under 2A at idle. They're all not very power efficient.
TacAir wrote:I'd love to get me some of that Elcraft love, but don't feel like taking out a loan on the house.
Kind of like back in the day when the KWM-2A was the hot/high performance radio to have, if one had buckets o money sitting in the shack. @$1250 USD in 1961, that would be $9,577 in today's dollarettes.
So, in comparison, the Elcraft still offers far better performance, weight savings and all that at an excellent price point - sorta. @ nearly $1,600USD, the rig is still out of reach for the vast majority of hobbyists found the bands today. Wait a second, just how many tanks of gas is that.... : )
The older radios had can had used at a better price point. A shame, but ham radio has always been (pretty much) a rich mans hobby, unless you roll your own.
Cool hobby, it's neat that someone with an older rig, like the Collins, can still converse with a person running the latest and greatest.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests