Collie of Doom wrote:For those of you who want to prep, but wouldn't be caught dead in a camo netting draped hunting lodge, I give you IKEA modular cabin! Survive in style!
http://www.ideabox.us/models/aktiv/But seriously, I really do like some of these modernist "cube" homes. I either like a legitimately old home built before World War II, or some ultra modern little thing with rain barrels, energy efficient everything, that can go off grid as needed. IKEA cabinetry doesn't hurt any.
Anybody got any more survive-in-style type housing or gardening plans?
Thanks for sharing that, Collie. That design reminds me very much of some housing units that resulted from architecture school projects and competitions in the immediate aftermath of Hurricane Katrina. And again following the Haitian earthquake. The formaldehyde-saturated debacle that has universally been ascribed to the words "FEMA trailer" could be largely avoided in the future if the government simply settled on a progressive, modular and easy to manufacture/transport design for housing refugees displaced by a major disaster. One that allows the user to further customize after moving in, to suit their practical and aesthetic needs.
Select a winning design, build and store a few hundred units, and then license the design to several mobile home manufacturers to have on file. Ready to ramp up production in a time of major disaster. Basically the Liberty Ship of emergency housing design.
Then set up a low interest rate program to finance the sale of said modular homes to the disaster victims after the initial stages of disaster recovery and resettlement. Or to the public if the original occupants are able to move back into their original homes. How cool would it be if young families and low income Americans could one day tell stories about how they got their start in home ownership with a "FEMA Disaster Cottage"?
It's just always seemed to me to be one of those ideas that the government won't use simply because it seems to make
too much sense.