
Moderator: ZS Global Moderators
Cymro wrote:Seriously, I'm not sure I'd fuck with Ad'lan if he had his bow with him. I just don't see that ending well.

Ad'lan wrote:And that's only in the first minute. Seems like Back Quivers are the Bow Ninja's gear of choice.
Gypsyblood wrote:@NXP...
“The comparison between the compound and the war bow was not to say that the compound bow was a niche weapon, rather it was a major step forward in archery.”
Gotcha![]()
My favorite bows now are Borders, but my first deer from a tree stand was with a Howard Hill Big 5. Trying to put a stand up in a swampy area of Florida while being conscious of having room to pull that long-ass bow back was an interesting challenge! That old HH was sooo slow.
I almost bought a Black Swan but took a trip to Scotland and bought a Border Archery bow. While I picked up an R/D longbow (Griffon) and a shorter "blind" version called "Hawk," Border is mostly known for their recurves/limbs and after doing a bit of research and taking a trip up to Scotland to get the full factory tour, I was sold. They are doing amazing things with carbon. I was an instant loyal customer! These have double carbon lams and are incredibly fast (which to me translates to normal speed with heavy arrows). I’m able to shoot 700g arrows with good speed, and holy poo-poo are these bows light!
At my club in England we’d go a roving and there would be a couple of compound shooters, a few horn-nock self-longbow shooters, me and another lad shooting Borders, and a few recurve shooters. We’d shoot in deep woods at randomly placed 3D targets and at long distances (for target preservation purposes, of course) usually through the openings in trees. It was a blast watching the longbow shooters shoot over the top tree limb, us and the recurve guys shoot over the second limb, and the compound guys go straight at it. I always thought the good longbow guys had the greatest skill because they had to judge that arc. I imagine you have to do the same with your primitive bow. I need to get some osage and have a go at making a primitive bow myself.
“... my pop up blind is 60" to the center hub, and I can still shoot a 64" longbow in it (canted over of course)”
Mind if I ask what kind of blind? I am in the market for one and I’d like to get feedback from a trad shooter.
Gypsyblood wrote:@Quietus
Thanks. The Big 5 has a lot of great memories and it's has been passed on to my eldest son. I see you are in Denmark. If you go to any 3D tourneys keep your eyes open for Border Archery bows. I have a few friends in Finland and Germany that love them and I bet you can find one to at least have a look at over there. I don't think I'll ever buy another brand of bow again (but I will buy more Borders, much to my wife's chagrin)
Both Border and Howard Hill are both very small, family owned businesses that make quality goods. I like to support that kind of thing, especially in this unfortunate Wal-Mart era.
Quietus wrote:Kyle Ryder wrote:In these coming times warbows will be handy bits of kit to have. Defending a household, especially from an upstair's vantage-point with one would certainly give an attacking foe a nightmare.
Nope.
A traditional English warbow is a very specialized tool. They are designed to lob a very heavy arrow very far. Nothing else.
The reason those arrows were very heavy, was to give them enough mass to ensure a lot a of impact energy, even at great distances.
Sure, a lighter arrow would be faster, but less weight also means less inertia. And that is a problem.
So now we have a very heavy arrow and a bow with a very slow cast. The only way to compensate, is higher poundage.
The point is, that warbows were made to get a very heavy arrow to kill a dude who is likely to be wearing some form of protection, without getting to close to him.
For what you are suggesting, you would be many times better of with something in the 60lbs range. Your potential targets would be close, and either wearing no armour, or armour that you are not likely to penetrate anyway.
Unless you are lucky enough, that they just happen to be wearing fairly low level kevlar. The right arrow can penetrate that, but you still wouldn't need more than ~60lbs.
Yep. Warbows can be used for hunting. There is no reason why they shouldn't be able to do that. But unless you are hunting elephant, you can get by with a lighter longbow.
That doesn't mean that the warbow wouldn't be fun to hunt with under the right circumstances.
Apart from that, they have little practical value these days. They have a place in sports and historical archery, but that's about it.
Ad'lan wrote:Kyle Ryder wrote:I think warbows are very similar in length to sub-80lb longbows...Kyle Ryder wrote:In these coming times warbows will be handy bits of kit to have. Defending a household, especially from an upstair's vantage-point with one would certainly give an attacking foe a nightmare.
If that is your concern, then get your shotgun license. I'm with Gypsy Blood, the warbow is designed for fighting a large, stupid enemy. Namely the French. It was used for other purposes because that is what people had to hand, and they were very good at using the warbow, not because it was the best bow for the job. The Warbow is a magnificent design, but it's not what I'd select for "Combat Archery" out side of a specific set of circumstances.
Already got a Shotgun but don't see why I should restrict myself to the easy thing that goes bang. Also they run out of ammo, make a noise and turn into a an expensive club when shells are no-where to be found
The way the country is going it won't be long before these are restricted to land-owners or the gentry. The ptb have been banning guns ever since the 30s, given the current trend it won't be long before shotguns are taken away as well.
A Warbow is the best, it's that simple.
Gypsyblood wrote:So I believe modern compound bows are nothing like the warbows were from the 16th century and before. In fact, I’d say they are apples and oranges.
I'd agree most strongly. They fulfil very different roles. The Warbow is more like the medieval AK, but in a .50 Cal. There isn't really any good modern way of analogy to it.Gypsyblood wrote:If my longbow shooting friends from England participated in a 3D tourney over here, they’d most often be invited to participate in the primitive, self bow class.
In the UK, off the top of my head to shoot NFAS in the longbow category, has to be wooden, feather fletched arrows.Gypsyblood wrote:Now, whether or not the modern compound is superior to the modern, carbon-limbed, reflex-deflex longbow is the subject of further, more intense debate, best done around the campfire at the end of a shoot, and over a few beers.
Better for a given value of Better
Quietus wrote:@Gypsyblood:
That Big 5 is one seriously beautiful piece of kit. A friend of mine has one, and I have been thinking about getting either that or the Wesley Special at some point.
And they offer both in 200lbs @ 32 inches![]()
I'm still pretty far from being able to handle that, but just the fact that they do it, is awesome.
Kissing-Tom wrote:Old School Combat Archery:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mSSM9b0hbR0
View at the 10:30 minute. It was last year in Germany, me and my wife was there, it was amazing. (Please don´t look at the clothes, it wasn´t reenactment)
Kyle Ryder wrote:Yes and no. A warbow with a flight arrow will go a lot further than a hunting longbow of lower poundage with the same arrow-weight, it's simple velocity and force.
Kyle Ryder wrote:Historically longbowmen would use 'galling' arrows (flight arrows) for the extreme ranges of 300 yards or more, which is what they did at Agincourt etc.
Kyle Ryder wrote:Maybe a 140 lb warbow is a little over kill, but having an 80 lb warbow that's still in the 'crossover' zone of hunting and warbow-levels would be a fine choice, especially with someone who is defending a settlement.
Kyle Ryder wrote:Don't forget, in Europe firearms are typically a lot less widespread in civilian areas, meaning that those with the bows will be well worth their while to a community
Kyle Ryder wrote:Kissing-Tom wrote:Old School Combat Archery:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mSSM9b0hbR0
View at the 10:30 minute. It was last year in Germany, me and my wife was there, it was amazing. (Please don´t look at the clothes, it wasn´t reenactment)
Pretty good in a casual day-out kinda way.
From about 13:00 they get the commands right and use the proper term 'loose' (abeit with a German slant)
I'm no expert on medieval accroutements of the Holy Roman Empire but did the German archers of olde use arrowbags like the English?
A lot of them are using back quivers (one guy has a bloody great arrow basket! Ye Gods!), nor did I see any planting arrows out in front of them for quick action either. Maybe it's just an English thing?
I suspect they are nearly all using reenactment bows / Holmguard bows / flat bows of sub-30 lb?
Kyle Ryder wrote:Already got a Shotgun but don't see why I should restrict myself to the easy thing that goes bang. Also they run out of ammo, make a noise and turn into a an expensive club when shells are no-where to be found
Kyle Ryder wrote:The way the country is going it won't be long before these are restricted to land-owners or the gentry. The ptb have been banning guns ever since the 30s, given the current trend it won't be long before shotguns are taken away as well.
Kyle Ryder wrote:A Warbow is the best, it's that simple.
Cymro wrote:Seriously, I'm not sure I'd fuck with Ad'lan if he had his bow with him. I just don't see that ending well.

Kissing-Tom wrote:Kyle Ryder wrote:Kissing-Tom wrote:Old School Combat Archery:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mSSM9b0hbR0
View at the 10:30 minute. It was last year in Germany, me and my wife was there, it was amazing. (Please don´t look at the clothes, it wasn´t reenactment)
Pretty good in a casual day-out kinda way.
From about 13:00 they get the commands right and use the proper term 'loose' (abeit with a German slant)
I'm no expert on medieval accroutements of the Holy Roman Empire but did the German archers of olde use arrowbags like the English?
A lot of them are using back quivers (one guy has a bloody great arrow basket! Ye Gods!), nor did I see any planting arrows out in front of them for quick action either. Maybe it's just an English thing?
I suspect they are nearly all using reenactment bows / Holmguard bows / flat bows of sub-30 lb?
Well, in the medieval Germany wasn´t archery so popular like in England. But it was the same stuff like in England.
Here is a photo of me, with a handmade bowbag(the original was found in Sweden). Very practical. For 30 big arrows.![]()
Here is a better picture of the quiver:http://shop.strato.de/epages/15502242.sf/de_DE/?ObjectPath=/Shops/15502242/Products/53
Beste Grüße, Tom.

SavageArcher wrote:This has been an interesting thread so far, still haven't gotten an answer to who all shoots three fingers under but thats ok. I'm used to being passed over as a typical ZS thread tends to meander around like a drunken Scotchman with his kilt over his head.
Gypsyblood wrote:I don't think it is truely instinctive shooting.
Users browsing this forum: bc99 and 5 guests