Moderator: ZS Global Moderators
Tater Raider wrote:Any other thoughts I might have on the matter don't belong on ZS.

George Orwell wrote:Power is not a means; it is an end. One does not establish a dictatorship in order to safeguard a revolution; one makes the revolution in order to establish the dictatorship. The object of persecution is persecution. The object of torture is torture. The object of power is power.
Trent wrote:I think it would take quite some time for any large scale anti-partisan sweeps to occur. The US military is larger than the next four put together; any invading army is going to have it's hands full at the frontlines between occupied and independent territory. Last thing the occupation forces would want is to be dealing with widespread revolt on top of that.
Did the Axis in WWII collect weapons in conquered territories? I don't think, but am not totally sure, that the US did either in Vietnam or Iraq. Going door to door would probably be the worst way to do it for the invaders. If they tried, I'd expect a system where weapons are traded for increased supplies, electricity, and as payment for punishments. Want an extra 25% rations? That'll be four rifles. Cousin Joe tried to rob a supply warehouse? Ten firearms. Etc.
In the first six hours though, I'd imagine that if you stayed in your house you'd be relatively safe. Government buildings, military bases, police stations, etc would be the top priority, not rooting around in a million potential ambushes. In the next few days, then you might get trouble.
George Orwell wrote:Power is not a means; it is an end. One does not establish a dictatorship in order to safeguard a revolution; one makes the revolution in order to establish the dictatorship. The object of persecution is persecution. The object of torture is torture. The object of power is power.
Berkem wrote:I wonder if our foreign friends quite understand how little record is kept of who owns what gun in our country. We keep better records of car ownership
Yes in know about that.But still you register guns in some states.Does "I sold them all at a gun show" work better for you? And no keeping paperwork for such things is not required here.
They migt say-No,our soldier was killed a couple of blocks away from here,that doesnt work for us.We think you are hiding guns.
Berkem wrote:No there isn't. If the gun shops destroy all the records
Do you always pay for your guns in cash?How do you pay for your gun-related stuff from the i-net?

raptor wrote:Let me inject a note of reality.
Tater Raider wrote:Any other thoughts I might have on the matter don't belong on ZS.

Rev wrote:Berkem wrote:There is lots of info other than that for any one who invades . There are many ways to get more or less complete list of gun enthusiasts in town.
Pretty much everyone in the entirety of Appalachia?

raptor wrote:Let me inject a note of reality.


Regular Guy wrote:raptor wrote:Let me inject a note of reality.
An invasion would never happen. Even if there were a force big enough, they'd have to defeat the best submarine, the best surface fleet, the best coast guard and the premier Air Force in the world. And that's not even hitting land yet. Let's not forget, our forces are battle hardened from 10 years of fighting on two fronts. Never gonna happen however, for amusement purposes, it's kind of fun. Kind of like a Slide Fire, fucking retarded but I'm sure everyone wants to shoot one.
Tater Raider wrote:Any other thoughts I might have on the matter don't belong on ZS.

think it would take quite some time for any large scale anti-partisan sweeps to occur. The US military is larger than the next four put together; any invading army is going to have it's hands full at the frontlines between occupied and independent territory. Last thing the occupation forces would want is to be dealing with widespread revolt on top of that
In the first six hours though, I'd imagine that if you stayed in your house you'd be relatively safe. Government buildings, military bases, police stations, etc would be the top priority
Tater Raider wrote:Regular Guy wrote:raptor wrote:Let me inject a note of reality.
I think Isreal has the US beat on Air Force, but that's splitting hairs really.


Regular Guy wrote:Tater Raider wrote:Regular Guy wrote:raptor wrote:Let me inject a note of reality.
I think Isreal has the US beat on Air Force, but that's splitting hairs really.
One on one, Israelis are better pilots, however, they have a around 400 jet fighters. We have somewhere in the neighborhood of 3,000 and in that number we have around 300 next gen fighters those being the F-22, F-35 and F-18 Super Hornet. The Izzys have no next gen.
However, props to them because they are the only pilots to stand toe to toe with the US Air Force.
Fly, Fight, Win. Fuck yeah.
Tater Raider wrote:Any other thoughts I might have on the matter don't belong on ZS.

Tater Raider wrote:Regular Guy wrote:Tater Raider wrote:Regular Guy wrote:I think Isreal has the US beat on Air Force, but that's splitting hairs really.
One on one, Israelis are better pilots, however, they have a around 400 jet fighters. We have somewhere in the neighborhood of 3,000 and in that number we have around 300 next gen fighters those being the F-22, F-35 and F-18 Super Hornet. The Izzys have no next gen.
However, props to them because they are the only pilots to stand toe to toe with the US Air Force.
Fly, Fight, Win. Fuck yeah.
And the planes we do sell them they improve. F-15I and F-16I are great examples. Planes v. pilots, I'll take pilots. Could be argued either way though.



Tater Raider wrote:Any other thoughts I might have on the matter don't belong on ZS.

Kommander wrote:One would think that they would conduct a through electronic survey and whatnot but history shows that invaders are often unprepared for the actual conditions on the ground. I would actually not be surprised if an invader completely disregarded our armed citizenry as a bunch of hunters and rednecks.

raptor wrote:Though in this case I think the real failing would have to come from us allowing this massive military force to build on the border for months and then being surprised when this massive force of armor and troops makes a "surprise" push into the US.

bae wrote:raptor wrote:Though in this case I think the real failing would have to come from us allowing this massive military force to build on the border for months and then being surprised when this massive force of armor and troops makes a "surprise" push into the US.
Here's the view from behind my blade of grass at my beach house here, looking into Canada. I can drop rounds from my Barrett across the border if I have a mind to, I suspect.
If they start a buildup here, and try to push down into the Pacific NW, I'll post here and let y'all know before I hop out and start setting up the M1919s and M2HBs on the beach and up on the mountain.

raptor wrote:OK BAE you are in charge of keeping an eye on that part of the Canadian Border.
Let us know if you see any overwhelming invasion forces building up.
bae wrote:raptor wrote:OK BAE you are in charge of keeping an eye on that part of the Canadian Border.
Let us know if you see any overwhelming invasion forces building up.
I observed a Steller Sea Lion making a close-in recon patrol just this afternoon, the border is tense!

Rev wrote:bae wrote:raptor wrote:OK BAE you are in charge of keeping an eye on that part of the Canadian Border.
Let us know if you see any overwhelming invasion forces building up.
I observed a Steller Sea Lion making a close-in recon patrol just this afternoon, the border is tense!
Keep us apprised of the situation, but do not endanger yourself comrade! Long live the Republic!
George Orwell wrote:Power is not a means; it is an end. One does not establish a dictatorship in order to safeguard a revolution; one makes the revolution in order to establish the dictatorship. The object of persecution is persecution. The object of torture is torture. The object of power is power.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests