Moderator: ZS Global Moderators
JamesCannon wrote:I completely agree with crypto.

Tater Raider wrote:
www.dreamindemon.comgoofygurl wrote:Dogan – In charge of all things fucked up
quackfiend wrote:Some exceptions to the general size rule however should be made, in certain circumstances:Tater Raider wrote:
Especially in light of the images content.

Last edited by quackfiend on 31 Dec 2012, 23:59 pm, edited ∞ times in total.

gravediggerfour wrote:If you don’t know what your talking about don’t lead people, especially new people, astray.
JamesCannon wrote:There's a 23:00 -pm- too?

gravediggerfour wrote:If you don’t know what your talking about don’t lead people, especially new people, astray.

whisk.e.rebellion wrote:quackfiend wrote:Some exceptions to the general size rule however should be made, in certain circumstances:Tater Raider wrote:
Especially in light of the images content.
Sure, it's for a good cause. But, it's huge, brightly colored and generally distracting. Maybe I'm an old fart, but I like a line of text over a large banner.
*shrug*
If people really hate sig banners, they can just turn off sigs in the User Control Panel.






whisk.e.rebellion wrote:*Bump*
Remember, the rules are 100Kbytes and 600px × 200px.
If your sig image is larger than that, please take it upon yourself to change it before you're personally asked to.
||intarnet.us/images/avatars/*
whisk.e.rebellion wrote:334px × 126px
13.17KB
Just fine

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests