Moderators: Dave_M, ZS Global Moderators
Oneswunk wrote:Interesting idea, but I still prefer the feel of wood in my hands.
tarzan wrote:Not a sound argument for having wood, in my opinion.
Tommy Tran wrote:Before I drop hammer on a 'clear' SG I full finger both tubes!

BullOnParade wrote:Can anyone ID the levergun in this picture? It's a sample picture from an local, upcoming auction. I doubt it's what I want, but you guys might surprise me.
Wrangler wrote:Any experience with the Cimarron 1866? Thinking of getting one in 38 Spl.

squinty wrote:What? Damn I thought this was match.com. No wonder my profile didn't get any hits....

JTNieman wrote:Do you also look down the barrel when you pull the trigger to make sure it's clear? It's best to visually confirm the chamber's empty this way.
SMoAF wrote:Your sin is one of geography, not one of unmanliness. Pimp's sin is that he's, well....himself.
Doctorr Fabulous wrote:If you're in a fixed defense with a Mosin, you failed somewhere.
0122358 wrote:OK Z-SQUAD...ROSSI MODEL 92 IN .357 WHICH WOULD YOU RATHER HAVE...16 INCH BARREL OR 20 INCH AND WHY?


Regular Guy wrote:0122358 wrote:OK Z-SQUAD...ROSSI MODEL 92 IN .357 WHICH WOULD YOU RATHER HAVE...16 INCH BARREL OR 20 INCH AND WHY?
ARE YOU YELLING?I go for the 16" because all the powder is burnt in the first 10" or so of the barrel. The extra 4" maybe slowing the bullet down. The 16" is very damn handy and light. I have the 44 mag in 16" and it's scwheet.
JTNieman wrote:Do you also look down the barrel when you pull the trigger to make sure it's clear? It's best to visually confirm the chamber's empty this way.
SMoAF wrote:Your sin is one of geography, not one of unmanliness. Pimp's sin is that he's, well....himself.
Doctorr Fabulous wrote:If you're in a fixed defense with a Mosin, you failed somewhere.
0122358 wrote:OK Z-SQUAD...ROSSI MODEL 92 IN .357 WHICH WOULD YOU RATHER HAVE...16 INCH BARREL OR 20 INCH AND WHY?

MVegas wrote:0122358 wrote:OK Z-SQUAD...ROSSI MODEL 92 IN .357 WHICH WOULD YOU RATHER HAVE...16 INCH BARREL OR 20 INCH AND WHY?
Personally, I'd go with 16". Most .357 loads really don't seem to benefit much from more than that.
16" to 18" seems to be, in most cases, the sweet spot. You'd get a longer sight radius, but we're only talking about a 125-150yd cartridge at the outside.
Get the 16", with the quicker handling and better packability, I say.
JTNieman wrote:Do you also look down the barrel when you pull the trigger to make sure it's clear? It's best to visually confirm the chamber's empty this way.
SMoAF wrote:Your sin is one of geography, not one of unmanliness. Pimp's sin is that he's, well....himself.
Doctorr Fabulous wrote:If you're in a fixed defense with a Mosin, you failed somewhere.
Kiwi Bowhunter wrote:Mine started life as a 20", and ended up as a 12" and still shoots MOA at 110yds haha.
I'm sure 16" will be fine, but I wouldn't be opposed to going shorter.
Cheers,
Sean.

BullOnParade wrote:Kiwi Bowhunter wrote:Mine started life as a 20", and ended up as a 12" and still shoots MOA at 110yds haha.
I'm sure 16" will be fine, but I wouldn't be opposed to going shorter.
Cheers,
Sean.
Isn't the cut off for SBR taxes 16"? I assume this is why the question limits it to 16. Mantis and I were talking in a different thread about putting a full stock on a Rossi Ranch Hand. The Ranch hand is only a cut down version of the Rossi 1892, and is cheaper by about the cost of a quality laminate stock. So a 12" 1892 is on my "to do" list if I don't find a .357 1894 before then.


Doc Torr wrote:Anyone got a line on a US legal Winchester 1887 repro?


Doc Torr wrote:Anyone got a line on a US legal Winchester 1887 repro?




xLionx wrote:Doc Torr wrote:Anyone got a line on a US legal Winchester 1887 repro?
$992
http://www.budsgunshop.com/catalog/prod ... oke++Tubes




Oneswunk wrote:Interesting idea, but I still prefer the feel of wood in my hands.
tarzan wrote:Not a sound argument for having wood, in my opinion.
Tommy Tran wrote:Before I drop hammer on a 'clear' SG I full finger both tubes!

Clout wrote:Any suggestions on mounting a scope on a late (late 80's early 90's) model 94?
I got my dad one of these since his eyes have been failing him as of late.
I've looked into the single piece blocks with rings, etc. and just seem to be at a loss.
Oneswunk wrote:Interesting idea, but I still prefer the feel of wood in my hands.
tarzan wrote:Not a sound argument for having wood, in my opinion.
Tommy Tran wrote:Before I drop hammer on a 'clear' SG I full finger both tubes!

Gun_Nut_2k1 wrote:
http://www.brownells.com/.aspx/pid=8/Pr ... COUT-MOUNT

squinty wrote:What? Damn I thought this was match.com. No wonder my profile didn't get any hits....

Return to Longarms - Shotguns and Rifles
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests