I tacticooled my Ruger 10/22

General discussions regarding topics that aren't covered in one of the other sub-forums. NO DISCUSSION OF POLITICS!

Moderators: Dave_M, ZS Global Moderators

Re: I tacticooled my Ruger 10/22

Postby Jimmy NoFeet » Fri Jan 27, 2012 5:52 pm

KentsOkay wrote:
O_O

It runs?


Yes, how does it run?

I kinda sorta want one, just for the Earth-shattering power of Mikhail's cartridge wrapped by the ergonomic orgasm that Mattel birthed unto the world.
Maybe if we ignore him, he'll just go away.
User avatar
Jimmy NoFeet
*
 
Posts: 51
Joined: Sat Jan 21, 2012 11:24 pm

I tacticooled my Ruger 10/22

Postby GMScooter » Tue Jan 31, 2012 5:41 pm

Awesome tacti-cool candy cane. I assume that is the same kind as used by the FBI, delta force, and marines. Right?

( nifty 10/22 too!)
...in accordance with prophesy.

My Ka-Bar Potbelly Review

Image
User avatar
GMScooter
* *
 
Posts: 180
Joined: Sun Feb 07, 2010 4:12 pm
Location: Oklahoma

Re: I tacticooled my Ruger 10/22

Postby zombie_kibble » Tue Jan 31, 2012 10:27 pm

i have the same thing on my 10/22 and the front handguard was the same way. if u sand a little plastic off the top cover of the receiver it will bring it back up to level
Image
ZSC:035 Financial Officer
User avatar
zombie_kibble
* *
 
Posts: 169
Joined: Mon Apr 04, 2011 9:41 am
Location: LuVerne, Iowa

Re: I tacticooled my Ruger 10/22

Postby Thor » Wed Feb 01, 2012 10:11 pm

Optics finally came in and I finally got it to the range. The strike fire red dot is a great little cheap site. It was way off when first trying to zero it but after a few three shot groups it was dead on. I was shooting center of the black from 25 out to 100 yards. I highly recommend this red dot.

I think I might get one for my AR.

Image

Image

Image
User avatar
Thor
* *
 
Posts: 254
Joined: Wed Oct 21, 2009 3:31 pm
Location: On the bay with the blue crabs

Re: I tacticooled my Ruger 10/22

Postby MrM4Guy » Wed Feb 01, 2012 10:25 pm

Pretty cool!! I was pondering on whether to get the Archangel kit, the other one (forgot the part number, the folding stock one). Then I built my second 10-22 (which was going to be my tacticooled) 10-22 for my nine year old daughter when she suddenly took an interest in shooting. I took a factory stock and cut it down for her. Put the original barrel back on it. And now she has the biggest grin ever!!!
Ruger 10-22- $250ish, cutting ebay factory stock down- $15 dollars, New 10-22 for Daddy's next project and the grin of another generation of shooters and on top of it being my own Daughter? PRICELESS!
Go have fun with your new toy!
MORS CERTA VITA INCERTA
" Two means one, and one means none, so always have three..."
User avatar
MrM4Guy
* *
 
Posts: 135
Joined: Sun Jan 29, 2012 4:46 am
Location: Northern, CA

Re: I tacticooled my Ruger 10/22

Postby Thor » Wed Feb 01, 2012 10:32 pm

LOL my daughter (11 years old) laughs at me when I take the Archangel 10/22 out of the safe. I am not sure how to feel when an 11 year old says . . . hey daddy you gonna go shoot your plastic gun today?

Grrrr, it might be plastic girl but it shoots just fine.
User avatar
Thor
* *
 
Posts: 254
Joined: Wed Oct 21, 2009 3:31 pm
Location: On the bay with the blue crabs

Re: I tacticooled my Ruger 10/22

Postby MrM4Guy » Thu Feb 02, 2012 3:40 am

LOL!
MORS CERTA VITA INCERTA
" Two means one, and one means none, so always have three..."
User avatar
MrM4Guy
* *
 
Posts: 135
Joined: Sun Jan 29, 2012 4:46 am
Location: Northern, CA

Re: I tacticooled my Ruger 10/22

Postby thesupremeking » Thu Feb 02, 2012 12:12 pm

Image
Image
User avatar
thesupremeking
* * *
 
Posts: 642
Joined: Fri Sep 04, 2009 12:49 am
Location: Tucson

Re: I tacticooled my Ruger 10/22

Postby MrM4Guy » Fri Feb 03, 2012 1:19 am

thesupremeking, because he can.
MORS CERTA VITA INCERTA
" Two means one, and one means none, so always have three..."
User avatar
MrM4Guy
* *
 
Posts: 135
Joined: Sun Jan 29, 2012 4:46 am
Location: Northern, CA

Re: I tacticooled my Ruger 10/22

Postby breacher » Sun Feb 12, 2012 11:26 pm

my kid got his insperation from this post just picked up his 10/22 tonight and had me looking up the aftermarket parts and he is figuring the money he needs to save up...... i think its a great idea!!!
User avatar
breacher
* *
 
Posts: 110
Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 11:00 pm

Re: I tacticooled my Ruger 10/22

Postby Thor » Fri Jan 11, 2013 10:16 pm

Jimmy NoFeet wrote:
KentsOkay wrote:
O_O

It runs?


Yes, how does it run?

I kinda sorta want one, just for the Earth-shattering power of Mikhail's cartridge wrapped by the ergonomic orgasm that Mattel birthed unto the world.


I missed this question a while ago.

The Colt AR-15 I have is chambered in 7.62x39 and it shoots just like the ones chambered in .223 only it's effective range is much further then the .223, and the ammo is much cheaper. Well it used to be cheaper nowadays all ammo is expensive.
User avatar
Thor
* *
 
Posts: 254
Joined: Wed Oct 21, 2009 3:31 pm
Location: On the bay with the blue crabs

Re: I tacticooled my Ruger 10/22

Postby Doctorr Fabulous » Fri Jan 11, 2013 10:53 pm

Thor wrote:
Jimmy NoFeet wrote:
KentsOkay wrote:
O_O

It runs?


Yes, how does it run?

I kinda sorta want one, just for the Earth-shattering power of Mikhail's cartridge wrapped by the ergonomic orgasm that Mattel birthed unto the world.


I missed this question a while ago.

The Colt AR-15 I have is chambered in 7.62x39 and it shoots just like the ones chambered in .223 only it's effective range is much further then the .223,

Bullshit. Citation required.
Opinions subject to change without in light of new information.
Image

https://www.facebook.com/DocsGuns
User avatar
Doctorr Fabulous
ZS Lifetime Member
ZS Lifetime Member
 
Posts: 7835
Joined: Mon Oct 26, 2009 3:06 pm
Location: Central Florida

Re: I tacticooled my Ruger 10/22

Postby Thor » Sat Jan 12, 2013 12:11 am

Doctorr Fabulous wrote:
Thor wrote:
Jimmy NoFeet wrote:
KentsOkay wrote:
O_O

It runs?


Yes, how does it run?

I kinda sorta want one, just for the Earth-shattering power of Mikhail's cartridge wrapped by the ergonomic orgasm that Mattel birthed unto the world.


I missed this question a while ago.

The Colt AR-15 I have is chambered in 7.62x39 and it shoots just like the ones chambered in .223 only it's effective range is much further then the .223,

Bullshit. Citation required.


You're calling me out on what? Whether I have a colt Ar-15 in 7.62x39, or whether the effective range is further?
User avatar
Thor
* *
 
Posts: 254
Joined: Wed Oct 21, 2009 3:31 pm
Location: On the bay with the blue crabs

Re: I tacticooled my Ruger 10/22

Postby Doctorr Fabulous » Sat Jan 12, 2013 12:29 am

Thor wrote:You're calling me out on what? Whether I have a colt Ar-15 in 7.62x39, or whether the effective range is further?

I don;t see how 7.62x39 has a longer effective range then 5.56. I guess I shoudl ask how you're defining effective range.
Opinions subject to change without in light of new information.
Image

https://www.facebook.com/DocsGuns
User avatar
Doctorr Fabulous
ZS Lifetime Member
ZS Lifetime Member
 
Posts: 7835
Joined: Mon Oct 26, 2009 3:06 pm
Location: Central Florida

Re: I tacticooled my Ruger 10/22

Postby Thor » Tue Apr 02, 2013 6:20 pm

Doctorr Fabulous wrote:
Thor wrote:You're calling me out on what? Whether I have a colt Ar-15 in 7.62x39, or whether the effective range is further?

I don;t see how 7.62x39 has a longer effective range then 5.56. I guess I should ask how you're defining effective range.


Its not really how I define effective range. It's about the round, and more importantly the platform it's being fired from. In this case it's all about the platform. When I say 7.62x39 you immediately think AK-47 type rifle. I'm not firing that platform, I'm firing an AR-15 platform.

When you see the AK firing in high speed camera footage you can see why the effective range is only 150 meters. Press the bang button and that thing jumps and shakes like it needs epilepsy pills. But that's the way it was designed, and that's why it is the most popular rifle on the planet. Those loose tolerances mean you can use it in almost any environment without having it jam.


The AR on the other hand is rock solid. But it requires more time keeping it in working order which is why it is chosen by folks who want accuracy.


So, now I am firing a MUCH more massive round, with with a higher muzzle energy out of a MUCH more stable platform. So in the end it's really about comparing apples and apples here. 7.62 out of an AR and 5.56 out of an AR.

Trust me when I tell you the AR-15 chamber in 7.62x39 is a more effective long range weapon then an AR-15 firing the 5.56x45. Which is why people who actually hunt deer with the AR chamber it in 7.62x39.
User avatar
Thor
* *
 
Posts: 254
Joined: Wed Oct 21, 2009 3:31 pm
Location: On the bay with the blue crabs

Re: I tacticooled my Ruger 10/22

Postby ZomCon Sargeant » Tue Apr 02, 2013 9:04 pm

If you like it then cool. I prefer the original stocks myself, however I am going to have to "Tacticool" my wife's 10/22 with a ATI Strikeforce stock due to the fact that the original stock is to long for her and finding a good price on a Youth Stock is difficult. let alone finding one right now.
"ZomCon: A better life through containment"
User avatar
ZomCon Sargeant
ZS Member
ZS Member
 
Posts: 97
Joined: Fri Nov 25, 2011 11:16 pm
Location: Pig's Eye MN

Re: I tacticooled my Ruger 10/22

Postby Thor » Tue Apr 02, 2013 9:09 pm

ZomCon Sargeant wrote:If you like it then cool. I prefer the original stocks myself, however I am going to have to "Tacticool" my wife's 10/22 with a ATI Strikeforce stock due to the fact that the original stock is to long for her and finding a good price on a Youth Stock is difficult. let alone finding one right now.


Can't you just shave a few inches off the stock and put the butt pad back on?
User avatar
Thor
* *
 
Posts: 254
Joined: Wed Oct 21, 2009 3:31 pm
Location: On the bay with the blue crabs

Re: I tacticooled my Ruger 10/22

Postby ZomCon Sargeant » Wed Apr 03, 2013 6:24 pm

Thor wrote:
ZomCon Sargeant wrote:If you like it then cool. I prefer the original stocks myself, however I am going to have to "Tacticool" my wife's 10/22 with a ATI Strikeforce stock due to the fact that the original stock is to long for her and finding a good price on a Youth Stock is difficult. let alone finding one right now.


Can't you just shave a few inches off the stock and put the butt pad back on?


I could but it is a Synthetic making it a little more difficult.
"ZomCon: A better life through containment"
User avatar
ZomCon Sargeant
ZS Member
ZS Member
 
Posts: 97
Joined: Fri Nov 25, 2011 11:16 pm
Location: Pig's Eye MN

Re: I tacticooled my Ruger 10/22

Postby rustypipes » Wed Apr 03, 2013 6:28 pm

cmxterra wrote:I assume you don't have an AR?

So fucking what if he dont
rustypipes
*
 
Posts: 32
Joined: Tue Feb 12, 2013 2:20 pm

Re: I tacticooled my Ruger 10/22

Postby Gun_Nut_2k1 » Wed Apr 03, 2013 6:45 pm

You know I sold a few of those archangel kits back in the day. I wish I could get my hands on one of the bayos now. It would make for a great blocker when making sheaths.

Thor wrote:LOL my daughter (11 years old) laughs at me when I take the Archangel 10/22 out of the safe. I am not sure how to feel when an 11 year old says . . . hey daddy you gonna go shoot your plastic gun today?

Grrrr, it might be plastic girl but it shoots just fine.


The worst part is she is probably making fun of your Glock and not your 22lr. :wink:
GN

Oneswunk wrote:Interesting idea, but I still prefer the feel of wood in my hands.

tarzan wrote:Not a sound argument for having wood, in my opinion.

Tommy Tran wrote:Before I drop hammer on a 'clear' SG I full finger both tubes!
User avatar
Gun_Nut_2k1
ZS Member
ZS Member
 
Posts: 4174
Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 6:03 am
Location: Tucson, AZ

Re: I tacticooled my Ruger 10/22

Postby northernxposure » Wed Apr 03, 2013 8:25 pm

Thor wrote:
Doctorr Fabulous wrote:
Thor wrote:You're calling me out on what? Whether I have a colt Ar-15 in 7.62x39, or whether the effective range is further?

I don;t see how 7.62x39 has a longer effective range then 5.56. I guess I should ask how you're defining effective range.


Its not really how I define effective range. It's about the round, and more importantly the platform it's being fired from. In this case it's all about the platform. When I say 7.62x39 you immediately think AK-47 type rifle. I'm not firing that platform, I'm firing an AR-15 platform.

When you see the AK firing in high speed camera footage you can see why the effective range is only 150 meters. Press the bang button and that thing jumps and shakes like it needs epilepsy pills. But that's the way it was designed, and that's why it is the most popular rifle on the planet. Those loose tolerances mean you can use it in almost any environment without having it jam.
Vidya

The AR on the other hand is rock solid. But it requires more time keeping it in working order which is why it is chosen by folks who want accuracy.
Vidya Dos

So, now I am firing a MUCH more massive round, with with a higher muzzle energy out of a MUCH more stable platform. So in the end it's really about comparing apples and apples here. 7.62 out of an AR and 5.56 out of an AR.

Trust me when I tell you the AR-15 chamber in 7.62x39 is a more effective long range weapon then an AR-15 firing the 5.56x45. Which is why people who actually hunt deer with the AR chamber it in 7.62x39.


Wat? :|

This is - a mess.

Platform has nothing to do with it, albeit that the AR platform has a better chance of long distance accuracy due to a presumably free floated barrel and no interaction with a carrier mounted piston.

The round is roughly double the weight at 123gr (.311 truncated, not a true .308) with an SD of .182@2300fps MV./ 1500ft#. We'll figure the standard M855 NATO 62gr 5,56 bullet at 3100fps MV/1303ft#. Numbers get better yet with Mk262. Really in the grand scheme of things, it's a wash. The 200 extra ft#'s is beneficial for that little extra punch under 150yrds, but over that diminishing returns prevail.

The last sentence just doesn't work. They're both medium range carts, one optimized for short range and lob, the other for distance and yaw. Plenty of folks hunt with a 5.56AR, I do all the time. 5,56 has more options on loads than the 7,62 Russian, especially for hunting. Use the right bullet for the job.

NXP
northernxposure
* * * * *
 
Posts: 2563
Joined: Thu Nov 06, 2008 10:33 pm
Location: EWI

Re: I tacticooled my Ruger 10/22

Postby Aim2Maim » Fri Apr 05, 2013 9:32 pm

+1 on the Vortex Strikefire. I use it on my AR and love it. Mine was also terribly off when zeroing in. Like nearly a foot @ 100yds. However simple adjustments made and it shoots great, good solid mount. I havent had any problems with the mount coming loose or it holding zero.
Behold the pale white horse, the man that sat on him was death, and hell followed with him.
If you prepare for the impossible, you can survive the inevitable.
Aim2Maim
* *
 
Posts: 141
Joined: Fri Feb 04, 2011 11:17 pm

Previous

Return to General Firearms Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Maverick299, vawilderness and 15 guests