Best all around survival rifle.

General discussions regarding topics that aren't covered in one of the other sub-forums. NO DISCUSSION OF POLITICS!

Moderators: Dave_M, ZS Global Moderators

Best all around survival rifle.

Postby kyle » Mon Nov 01, 2004 2:49 pm

This was something I was thinking about and saw it mentioned in the Rifle/shotgun sling thread:

Mugwug wrote:Not sure where I'm gonna go with it at this point, it still ranks as a perfect PAW rifle over both my M14 and the AR15 (they are sexier, but the SKS is much more practical).


I was concluding that as well but I thought maybe I was just being bias.

5.56mm rifles - AR15, Mini 14
The .223 cal isn't as useful for other duties like hunting or anytime where you need stronger knock down power.

7.62x51mm - FN-FAL, M14
This round has better knock down but it's much heavier so you don't want to use it for tactical purposes over longer periods of time.

7.62x39mm - AK-47, SKS
AK-47 isn't a bad choice. You have detachable mags so it's far better for heated tactical situations but it's loud and not as accurate without profesional tweeking. You can get an Chinese SKS-D that takes AK mags but I don't know that much about them.

My opinion is to go with the SKS if you can't keep multiple firearms with you for different jobs. I've actually never fired a FN-FAL. I just tossed it in there so the M14 wasn't lonely. :)

Thoughts?
Zombie Squad - "We can handle it from here. We've talked about this on the Internet."
User avatar
kyle
ZS Board Member
ZS Board Member
 
Posts: 15170
Joined: Wed Mar 17, 2004 3:18 pm
Location: St. Louis

Postby Norseman » Mon Nov 01, 2004 3:03 pm

A buddy of mines dad was spotting for artillery in Vietnam from a prop plane and had a VC grab an SKS out of the water in a rice paddy and fire at them. They called in artillery, killed the VC, landed the plane and he retreived the rifle. He said any rifle that can be treated like that and still fire, he wanted. He brought it back as a War Trophy back when that was still legal.

Bottom line - the stock SKS is an extremely durable and reliable weapon for a survival rifle.
"People sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf." ---George Orwell
User avatar
Norseman
* * *
 
Posts: 547
Joined: Wed Jul 21, 2004 8:06 pm
Location: Everywhere - possibly behind you right now.

Postby -Jason- » Mon Nov 01, 2004 4:22 pm

I would say the AR-15. It uses ammo more commonly found in the US and is more accurate, and you need accuracy when hitting something as small as a head. Also it may not work after being pulled from the water and things like that but you really shouldn't go in the water with guns anyway. And if I recall wet bullets still misfire so it doesnt matter as much if it still shots or not.
-Jason-
ZS Member
ZS Member
 
Posts: 1459
Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2004 10:37 pm
Location: Southern, New Jersey

Postby Mugwug » Mon Nov 01, 2004 6:15 pm

I've thought long and hard about this, and the SKS is the perfect rifle when it comes to survival/PAW/zombies, here's my thinking on this...

1. The 7.62x39mm round is a perfect compromise, you get .30 cal at damn near .223 size. Neglible recoil compared with full .308, and still a little more punch than .223. Good enough for hunting, sufficient for defence, not too much and not too little.

2. The SKS is one of the most brutally simple semi-auto rifles I have ever seen, it was designed for use by illiterate peasants, functions when filthy and just keeps going (the energizer bunny of semi-autos if you will). A proven track record of functioning despite abuse.

3. They are DIRT cheap, which means for a minimal investment their owners can put their money into ammo and practice, PRACTICE, PRACTICE!.

Was thinking about this the other night, and the more I thought about it the more I figured if the SHTF I'd grab my SKS and leave the other toys in the closet when it came time to bug out....Its the cheapest firearm I own, and I'm pretty sure it'd be the one I'd take.
User avatar
Mugwug
* * * * *
 
Posts: 2042
Joined: Tue Jun 01, 2004 8:44 pm
Location: Not Toronto, Canada

Postby raptorman » Mon Nov 01, 2004 6:53 pm

My opinion for survival purposes;
AR-15 family firing .223.
Why? High muzzle velocity, and better accuracy than most common 7.62 weapons. (AK clones)

When on the run, the .223 is a much more common round to find when scavenging large military caches (the factories that should already be marked on your bugout charts).

The worst survival rifle;
Probably most bolt action hunting rifles. More expensive ammunition, longer load times, and slower firing rates.

I would still pick my CAR-15 over any of my other weapons, but also consider this;

If you have a rifle that fires the same rounds as your pistol, (a la MP5 & Glock 17) then you have a serious advantage in a "oh fuck here they come" scenario.

I have been in some high stress training situations when an instructor would ask my name, and I honestly couldn't remember it....Are you going to be the guy that attempts to load your .223 or 7.62 X39 into your pistol mag under pressure? You may, you may not be...the point is, YOU DON'T KNOW. You have not had your metal tested.

Another obvious advantage to having the same ammunition for both weapons is the definate logistic advantage...interchangability.

In summary, I would still go with the .223 AR family, however, the simplicity of the SKS and AK 47 (designed to be dismantled and cleaned by a 17 year old conscript) cannot be over stated.

I'm still going with the trusty AR/CAR/M4 variant, and I have the luxery of choice by owning the weapons I have commented on in this thread.
Author of Day by Day Armageddon and the sequel Day by Day Armageddon:Beyond Exile
JLBourne.com
Official Twitter Page
Official Facebook Page
User avatar
raptorman
* * * * *
 
Posts: 1216
Joined: Wed Mar 17, 2004 7:25 pm
Location: -On the run...

Postby jamoni » Mon Nov 01, 2004 7:43 pm

Raptorman wrote:I have been in some high stress training situations when an instructor would ask my name, and I honestly couldn't remember it....Are you going to be the guy that attempts to load your .223 or 7.62 X39 into your pistol mag under pressure? You may, you may not be...the point is, YOU DON'T KNOW. You have not had your metal tested.

:D Not gonna tell any stories, let's just say you can get a good nights sleep while tangled up in concertina wire.
I like the SKS. Believe it or not, I like the internal magazine: One less thing to lose.
JoergS wrote:Realistically, I think I can launch a nine pound chain saw at 50 fps from a shoulder mounted rubber powered bazooka...

squinty wrote:I reserve the right to yell "Dookyhole!" - or it's Hebrew equivalent if such a thing exists - whilst dispensing a barrage of palm strikes at my opponent.
User avatar
jamoni
ZS Global Moderator
ZS Global Moderator
 
Posts: 14942
Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2004 6:50 pm
Location: st louis

Postby kyle » Mon Nov 01, 2004 10:54 pm

raptorman wrote:If you have a rifle that fires the same rounds as your pistol, (a la MP5 & Glock 17) then you have a serious advantage in a "oh fuck here they come" scenario.


Aww... someone is getting soft on that MP5. You're going to make your CAR-15 jealous. :)

The swappable theory is probably great for a lot of situations but I don't think it would be optimal for long term survival. Can you take a deer down with a 9mm?

Can you drop any large game down with a .223?

Granted, with our super smart learned up brains we can trap animals. You probably won't worry about trapping laws if you're trying to stay alive. What if you're on the move? You might not have that kind of time.
Zombie Squad - "We can handle it from here. We've talked about this on the Internet."
User avatar
kyle
ZS Board Member
ZS Board Member
 
Posts: 15170
Joined: Wed Mar 17, 2004 3:18 pm
Location: St. Louis

Postby jamoni » Mon Nov 01, 2004 11:27 pm

Chuck Hawks claims to have taken 4 deer with a Browning HiPower. I don't see why he would lie about it. :P
JoergS wrote:Realistically, I think I can launch a nine pound chain saw at 50 fps from a shoulder mounted rubber powered bazooka...

squinty wrote:I reserve the right to yell "Dookyhole!" - or it's Hebrew equivalent if such a thing exists - whilst dispensing a barrage of palm strikes at my opponent.
User avatar
jamoni
ZS Global Moderator
ZS Global Moderator
 
Posts: 14942
Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2004 6:50 pm
Location: st louis

Postby raptorman » Tue Nov 02, 2004 12:02 am

You could kill a bear with a .223 round. You could easily hunt with the .223. If you can kill a man with it from hundreds of yards, you can kill game.

Now, as for a 9mm round, It would take forever for me to get close enough to the game.
Author of Day by Day Armageddon and the sequel Day by Day Armageddon:Beyond Exile
JLBourne.com
Official Twitter Page
Official Facebook Page
User avatar
raptorman
* * * * *
 
Posts: 1216
Joined: Wed Mar 17, 2004 7:25 pm
Location: -On the run...

Postby Joe Ghoul » Tue Nov 02, 2004 12:59 am

While I don't think I'd start out with the SKS, it would be essential to have back in reserve.

Its a perfect 'bury gun'. Wrap it in oily rags, and throw it and a couple of cases of ammo in a PVC pipe, and stick it in the ground. When the other guns start to go, pull out the old SKS. It would probably outlive you in the PAW.

In the early days of the PAW, however, I'd want something with more accuracy and capacity. Either my AR or AK, especially since I just put the folder on the AK. It would be a great trip gun.

I almost sold my SKS, just because I had a few other long guns. However, the last time I shot it, I couldn't bring myself to sell it. Hell, they're so cheap right now, I'd get next to nothing for it anyway.
Strap on your weapons and reinforce your means of travel.

C'est la (un)vie!
User avatar
Joe Ghoul
* * * * *
 
Posts: 1197
Joined: Tue May 18, 2004 2:57 am
Location: New Orleans, LA

Postby Red Panda » Tue Nov 02, 2004 1:17 am

I'm pretty much set on the SKS being my main battle rifle. The rifle/ammo is very cheap, that being a concern for my friends who want to get into shooting.

It seems as though a lot of Canadians who have their licence has a SKS. I guess us commies like to support each other.
User avatar
Red Panda
ZS Member
ZS Member
 
Posts: 1297
Joined: Sun May 02, 2004 6:18 pm
Location: Just outside Guelph, Ontario

Postby Mugwug » Tue Nov 02, 2004 3:49 am

I have beaten the hell out of several different makes of the SKS, and there is no rifle I have owned that has lived up to the reliability of the SKS.

The integral magazine makes reloading less complicated (no holding on to your external magazines for reloading). The stripper clips mean all your ammo can be carried "ready to use" / "ready to load" so theres no fumbling with single rounds, the rifle comes with (as do so many milsurp rifles) its own cleaning kit and rod. The rifle is a semi-auto, and can deliver a fair volume of fire when needed.

The biggest advantage however is that an SKS owner can spend the extra money on ammo, and afford to practice a lot. My SKSs have seen more shooting time than any of my other firearms, and possibly more than the rest put together. Simply because the ammo weights in at $0.15 a round (compared to $0.60 and $0.40 each for the M14 and AR15 respectively)

Hell, don't get me wrong. I'd love to say my AR or M14 is preferable... I've got $1000 or more into each rifle when you count mags, optics and so forth, and to shrug them off in favour of a $200 rifle hurts.
User avatar
Mugwug
* * * * *
 
Posts: 2042
Joined: Tue Jun 01, 2004 8:44 pm
Location: Not Toronto, Canada

Postby Gundown » Tue Nov 02, 2004 5:33 am

[quote="Jamoni]" :D Not gonna tell any stories, let's just say you can get a good nights sleep while tangled up in concertina wire.
I like the SKS. Believe it or not, I like the internal magazine: One less thing to lose.[/quote]

Heh... It's that first four hours that's hell. Are my friends gonna’ find me? Man I hope they find me? Shit where are they? Ah screw it I'ma take a nap.


I have a picture somewhere of me sleeping on my vest with my A-5 clung to my chest and my left leg wrapped up to my hip in wire.

The ONE damn time I didn't have a pair of snips on me and I'm branded for life.
Gundown
BANNED
 
Posts: 5022
Joined: Thu Oct 07, 2004 2:48 am
Location: Independence Missouri

Postby Valarius » Thu Nov 04, 2004 7:41 pm

Survival firearm, Valarius-style:

A single barrel shotgun. No matter what conditions I run from, I know my slightly rusted baby doesn't have that many moving parts, doesn't take that long to clean and doesn't weigh much. It comes with me in the PAW.

I like the idea of an SKS for my battle rifle, though.
See you around, HK.

Homeless survival techniques.
User avatar
Valarius
* * * * *
 
Posts: 3173
Joined: Thu Jun 03, 2004 12:42 am
Location: Around Nevada.

Postby Jonas » Fri Nov 05, 2004 10:46 am

I also like the idea of a single shot. NEF/H&R breaks have few moving parts, are inexpensive and come in rust proof versions with synthetic stocks.

From a tactical stand point they'd be pretty useless for fighting off zombies..though after you fire your shot you'd have a pretty handy club but for hunting and such they'd be awesome.

Also take into account if you get a rifle the same reciever can be fitted with other rifle barrels and shotgun barrels which makes it exceptionally useful.

If you were traveling at the speed of light and you fired a gun...would the bullet even leave the barrel?
Sometimes I cry so much I need a poncho.
User avatar
Jonas
* * *
 
Posts: 715
Joined: Sat May 29, 2004 3:15 pm
Location: swpa

Postby Jonas » Fri Nov 05, 2004 10:48 am

Sometimes I cry so much I need a poncho.
User avatar
Jonas
* * *
 
Posts: 715
Joined: Sat May 29, 2004 3:15 pm
Location: swpa

Postby kyle » Fri Nov 05, 2004 10:59 am

Jonas wrote:If you were traveling at the speed of light and you fired a gun...would the bullet even leave the barrel?


I think the bullet would fail to fire. Doesn't it need air?

Cheap sing shots would be good for packing in sealed containers and storing in various locations for bugging out to later but I wouldn't be comfortable using them as all around surival rifles.
Zombie Squad - "We can handle it from here. We've talked about this on the Internet."
User avatar
kyle
ZS Board Member
ZS Board Member
 
Posts: 15170
Joined: Wed Mar 17, 2004 3:18 pm
Location: St. Louis

Postby Mugwug » Fri Nov 05, 2004 11:07 am

Jonas wrote:If you were traveling at the speed of light and you fired a gun...would the bullet even leave the barrel?


What'd ya shooting at while travelling at the speed of light? I'm guessing I'd be too busy screaming "Holy crap! I'm travelling at the speed of light!" to shoot anything....
User avatar
Mugwug
* * * * *
 
Posts: 2042
Joined: Tue Jun 01, 2004 8:44 pm
Location: Not Toronto, Canada

Postby michelle » Fri Nov 05, 2004 11:54 am

Jonas wrote:If you were traveling at the speed of light and you fired a gun...would the bullet even leave the barrel?


Sort of. The speed of the bullet relative to the gun starts at 0, so it can still increase. However, you can't travel the speed of light. Faster or slower is ok.
a deviant path is the only way
:sk
User avatar
michelle
ZS Global Moderator
ZS Global Moderator
 
Posts: 2586
Joined: Thu Mar 18, 2004 6:54 pm
Location: South St. Louis

Postby jamoni » Fri Nov 05, 2004 6:53 pm

The closer you approach the speed of light, the more time compression there is. At the speed of light, the time compression becomes effectively infinite, meaning time stops. So you couldn't shoot anything at the speed of light.
Edit: and I'm pretty sure you'd destroy the universe.
JoergS wrote:Realistically, I think I can launch a nine pound chain saw at 50 fps from a shoulder mounted rubber powered bazooka...

squinty wrote:I reserve the right to yell "Dookyhole!" - or it's Hebrew equivalent if such a thing exists - whilst dispensing a barrage of palm strikes at my opponent.
User avatar
jamoni
ZS Global Moderator
ZS Global Moderator
 
Posts: 14942
Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2004 6:50 pm
Location: st louis

Postby kyle » Fri Nov 05, 2004 7:05 pm

Jamoni wrote:Edit: and I'm pretty sure you'd destroy the universe.


Hmm.. maybe we need to reconsider this "Zombie" Squad thing now. There seems to be bigger threats to the world than zombies.

We need to dispatch some Anti-Jonas Squad agents out to swpa ASAP.
Zombie Squad - "We can handle it from here. We've talked about this on the Internet."
User avatar
kyle
ZS Board Member
ZS Board Member
 
Posts: 15170
Joined: Wed Mar 17, 2004 3:18 pm
Location: St. Louis

Postby michelle » Fri Nov 05, 2004 7:35 pm

Jamoni wrote:The closer you approach the speed of light, the more time compression there is. At the speed of light, the time compression becomes effectively infinite, meaning time stops. So you couldn't shoot anything at the speed of light.
Edit: and I'm pretty sure you'd destroy the universe.


Again, it's a relativity thing. If you're the one moving "at the speed of light" time certainly doesn't stop for you. It may look like it to an outsider, but the insider knows differently.

However, moving at the speed of light may well destroy the universe.
a deviant path is the only way
:sk
User avatar
michelle
ZS Global Moderator
ZS Global Moderator
 
Posts: 2586
Joined: Thu Mar 18, 2004 6:54 pm
Location: South St. Louis

Postby Jonas » Fri Nov 05, 2004 9:33 pm

kyle wrote:
Jamoni wrote:Edit: and I'm pretty sure you'd destroy the universe.


Hmm.. maybe we need to reconsider this "Zombie" Squad thing now. There seems to be bigger threats to the world than zombies.

We need to dispatch some Anti-Jonas Squad agents out to swpa ASAP.


I invite the Anti-Jonas Squad to my house for cookies and guess what animal I'm pretending to be...........I'm a SNUGGLE-PHANT!!!!!
Sometimes I cry so much I need a poncho.
User avatar
Jonas
* * *
 
Posts: 715
Joined: Sat May 29, 2004 3:15 pm
Location: swpa

Postby SMERSH » Sat Nov 06, 2004 2:53 pm

the mini-14, M14, and SKS are all damn fine rifles, and are must haves, but what about the M1 garand?
User avatar
SMERSH
* * * * *
 
Posts: 2049
Joined: Sun Sep 05, 2004 7:17 pm
Location: a reddish blue state

Next

Return to General Firearms Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests